2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2011.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A higher energy conformer of (S)-proline is the active catalyst in intermolecular aldol reaction: Evidence from DFT calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Scheme 1 , three proline conformers have been considered in this work: two canonical ( P A and P B ) while the third zwitterionic ( P C ), which are in line with previous studies (Rankin et al 2002 ; Yang et al 2010 ; Ajitha and Suresh 2011 ; Yang et al 2015 ). P A and P B are canonical conformers that predominant in gas phase (Eszter et al 2003 ; Alln et al 2004 ; Kapitán et al 2006 ) and become the choice for catalytic studies (Rankin et al 2002 ; Yang et al 2010 ; Ajitha and Suresh 2011 ). P A is slightly less stable than P B with the relative energy of 1.6 kcal/mol (Table 1 and Additional file 1 : Table S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Scheme 1 , three proline conformers have been considered in this work: two canonical ( P A and P B ) while the third zwitterionic ( P C ), which are in line with previous studies (Rankin et al 2002 ; Yang et al 2010 ; Ajitha and Suresh 2011 ; Yang et al 2015 ). P A and P B are canonical conformers that predominant in gas phase (Eszter et al 2003 ; Alln et al 2004 ; Kapitán et al 2006 ) and become the choice for catalytic studies (Rankin et al 2002 ; Yang et al 2010 ; Ajitha and Suresh 2011 ). P A is slightly less stable than P B with the relative energy of 1.6 kcal/mol (Table 1 and Additional file 1 : Table S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Single-point energy calculations at the B3LYP/6-311++G (2df, 2pd) and MP2/6-311++G (2df, 2pd) levels of theory were then carried out on these optimized structures. Afterwards, the 6-31+G(d,p) and 6-311++G (2df, 2pd) basis sets were respectively designated as bs1 and bs2, and unless otherwise noted, all energies were reported at the B3LYP/bs2//B3LYP/bs1 level, which has been sufficiently validated before (Li et al 2011 ; Kim et al 2014 ; Yang et al 2009 ; Rankin et al 2002 ; Yang et al 2010 ; Ajitha and Suresh 2011 ) and in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established [ 21 , 23 ] that structural interconversion from 1a to 1b does not require a large energy barrier. This means that the two conformers are always present in a reaction vessel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pertaining to the proline catalyzed aldol reaction, Ajitha and Suresh proposed in 2011 [ 21 ], based on a density functional theory (DFT) study, that the lowest energy conformer (LEC) of ( S ) proline [ 22 ] was inactive with its reaction pathway not proceeding beyond an initial proton transfer step. In 2019, we confirmed these findings using the REP-FAMSEC technique [ 23 ] (Reaction Energy Profile–Fragment Attributed Molecular System Energy Change).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation