2022
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A higher DNA damage rate in aqueous eDNA particles suggests intra‐cellular eDNA degradation in cellular environments

Abstract: Analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA; i.e., extra-organismal DNA fragments in environmental samples such as water, soil, and air; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2021) has a substantially higher potential for rapid and nondestructive monitoring of biodiversity than traditional, capture-based surveys (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the DNA damage rate ( λ ) of zebrafish eDNA was higher in PMA treatments (representing viable zebrafish cells) than in non-PMA treatments (representing total zebrafish eDNA). This result supported that, in addition to microbes and their extracellular enzymes in the outer environments, eDNA may be actively degraded by intracellular enzymes such as DNases [35,51,59], implying that DNA in larger eDNA particles may not be stable and may thus provide a fresher signal. Furthermore, λ increased with passage of time only for PMA treatment but not for non-PMA treatment, implying that assessment of eDNA age based on DNA damage rate may be more appropriate to target intact cells.…”
Section: Selective Detection Of Viable Cell-derived Ednamentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the DNA damage rate ( λ ) of zebrafish eDNA was higher in PMA treatments (representing viable zebrafish cells) than in non-PMA treatments (representing total zebrafish eDNA). This result supported that, in addition to microbes and their extracellular enzymes in the outer environments, eDNA may be actively degraded by intracellular enzymes such as DNases [35,51,59], implying that DNA in larger eDNA particles may not be stable and may thus provide a fresher signal. Furthermore, λ increased with passage of time only for PMA treatment but not for non-PMA treatment, implying that assessment of eDNA age based on DNA damage rate may be more appropriate to target intact cells.…”
Section: Selective Detection Of Viable Cell-derived Ednamentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As a proof of concept, Jo [59] applied the approach to an eDNA sample and estimated the frequency of mitochondrial DNA damage in zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) eDNA particles in rearing water [59]. According to the study, DNA damage rates could vary depending on filter pore sizes and likely eDNA size fractions, implying the importance of intracellular enzymatic DNA degradation and the state-dependent eDNA persistence against environmental parameter and microbial activity [27,51].…”
Section: Estimation Of Dna Damage Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is important to investigate how these factors affect eDNA detection and dynamics within different environments. Despite some progress in understanding the role of bacteria in eDNA detection and persistence, there is still much to be explored in this area (Jo, 2023; Salter, 2018; Zulkefli et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%