2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Higher-Calorie Refeeding Protocol Does Not Increase Adverse Outcomes in Adult Patients with Eating Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
77
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For extremely underweight adult patients, there are currently only a few studies examining higher caloric refeeding, and therefore no commonly accepted, reliable recommendations regarding the value and safety of accelerated refeeding strategies exist. In a recent study on 119 adults with AN, higher initial caloric refeeding (i.e., 1500 instead of 1000 kcal/d) was described to provide additional nourishment, to medically stabilize patients, and to prevent RS [17]. The authors concluded that future research is needed to examine whether higher-calorie intakes (i.e., 2000 kcal/d), similar to those studied in adolescent patients, may also be beneficial to treat adult patients.…”
Section: Introduction: Refeeding and Refeeding Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For extremely underweight adult patients, there are currently only a few studies examining higher caloric refeeding, and therefore no commonly accepted, reliable recommendations regarding the value and safety of accelerated refeeding strategies exist. In a recent study on 119 adults with AN, higher initial caloric refeeding (i.e., 1500 instead of 1000 kcal/d) was described to provide additional nourishment, to medically stabilize patients, and to prevent RS [17]. The authors concluded that future research is needed to examine whether higher-calorie intakes (i.e., 2000 kcal/d), similar to those studied in adolescent patients, may also be beneficial to treat adult patients.…”
Section: Introduction: Refeeding and Refeeding Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four studies were non‐randomised cohort studies, three were retrospective 24‐26 and one prospective with historical controls 27 . Two studies 25,27 were non‐concurrent due to comparisons between previous and current refeeding protocols. All papers were published after the year 2000, with the earliest collected data from January 1, 1996 24 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zuercher et al 24 did not report if males were omitted due to exclusion criteria or simply due to no male admissions at the facility, whereas Robb et al 26 specifically excluded male participants. Similarly, most participants were female in the remaining two studies 25,27 (96% [n = 115/119] to 98% females [n = 55/56]). Three studies were conducted in the United States, 24,26,27 participants were of predominantly Caucasian ethnicity and diagnosed with anorexia nervosa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations