2019
DOI: 10.2144/btn-2018-0148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-Throughput Protocol for Isolating Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA from Peripheral Blood

Abstract: The analysis of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is potentially a less invasive, more dynamic assessment of cancer progression and treatment response than characterizing solid tumor biopsies. Standard isolation methods require separation of plasma by centrifugation, a time-consuming step that complicates automation. To address these limitations, we present an automatable magnetic bead-based ctDNA isolation method that eliminates centrifugation to purify ctDNA directly from peripheral blood (PB). To deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of a centrifugation step allows to automate the process and reduce the risk of cross-contamination [23]. It allows one to isolate a product from large volumes with a low DNA concentration without increasing the process execution time [24,25]. Size fractionation of DNA molecules is an important advantage that has found application in the preparation of samples for whole genome sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of a centrifugation step allows to automate the process and reduce the risk of cross-contamination [23]. It allows one to isolate a product from large volumes with a low DNA concentration without increasing the process execution time [24,25]. Size fractionation of DNA molecules is an important advantage that has found application in the preparation of samples for whole genome sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several companies developed a range of DNA isolation kits of which only the "dedicated" kits were recommended for the extraction of cfDNA [192]. In several papers, a variety of different kits were compared [84,85,93,[193][194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203][204]. From these results, one can conclude that bead-based isolation methods worked somewhat better than membrane-based kits and that the former ones are especially useful for the isolation of low-molecularweight DNA.…”
Section: Dna Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively low ctDNA levels in standard blood samples and background cfDNA unrelated to tumor cells make detection a challenge. Therefore, the standard procedure for blood collection and DNA isolation should be finalized prior to analysis 22,23…”
Section: Origin and Detection Of Cfdna/ctdnamentioning
confidence: 99%