2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-012-9819-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high-throughput method for measuring growth and loss rates in microalgal cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assay for estimating growth and loss rates. The main experiments were carried out essentially as described by Skjelbred et al (2012) in 96-well culture plates with white walls and optical bottoms (Nunc AS). Each strain was exposed to a 3-way factorial design with six temperatures (4°C-21°C), five salinities (15,20,25,30,35), and eight irradiance levels (21.7 -96.7 lmol Á photons Á m À2 Á s À1 ; 14:10 L:D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assay for estimating growth and loss rates. The main experiments were carried out essentially as described by Skjelbred et al (2012) in 96-well culture plates with white walls and optical bottoms (Nunc AS). Each strain was exposed to a 3-way factorial design with six temperatures (4°C-21°C), five salinities (15,20,25,30,35), and eight irradiance levels (21.7 -96.7 lmol Á photons Á m À2 Á s À1 ; 14:10 L:D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we developed a specific experimental device based on microplates. Similar tools have been previously used to assess growth for microalgae [40]. However, in this study, we had to face specific constraints, including the presence of bacteria that can affect optical measurements for microalgae concentration and bacterial cross-contamination between wells.…”
Section: High-throughput Selection Of Growth-promoting Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were conducted on altogether 4 white 96-well plates with clear, optical bottoms (Perkin-Elmer Optiplate™ 96). White wells were chosen to reduce light noise from adjacent wells when reading the fluorescence, and to reduce absorption and attenuation of light (Skjelbred et al 2012), while optical bottoms ensured correct readings without reflection. Each treatment in the experiment was conducted with 2 replicates on each plate, and on 2 identical plates, creating a total of 4 replicates.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%