2016
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00537-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-Throughput Approach To Identify Compounds That Impair Envelope Integrity in Escherichia coli

Abstract: The envelope of Gram-negative bacteria constitutes an impenetrable barrier to numerous classes of antimicrobials. This intrinsic resistance, coupled with acquired multidrug resistance, has drastically limited the treatment options against Gram-negative pathogens. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate an assay for identifying compounds that increase envelope permeability, thereby conferring antimicrobial susceptibility by weakening of the cell envelope barrier in Gram-negative bacteria. A hig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore sought to explore systematically the limiting factors for lack of anti-Gram-negative activity of compound 11a. To investigate possible difficulties with its penetration into the bacterial cell, we tested compound 11a on a diverse panel of mutant E. coli strains carrying loss-of-function mutations in either dapF, mrcB or surA genes that disrupt the bacterial cell wall integrity [27]. As a parallel approach, to test the susceptibility of compounds to efflux, we treated the parental strains and their corresponding mutants with an efflux pump inhibitor phenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide (PAβN), which is in fact not a typical inhibitor but a substrate for efflux pumps that is preferentially effluxed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore sought to explore systematically the limiting factors for lack of anti-Gram-negative activity of compound 11a. To investigate possible difficulties with its penetration into the bacterial cell, we tested compound 11a on a diverse panel of mutant E. coli strains carrying loss-of-function mutations in either dapF, mrcB or surA genes that disrupt the bacterial cell wall integrity [27]. As a parallel approach, to test the susceptibility of compounds to efflux, we treated the parental strains and their corresponding mutants with an efflux pump inhibitor phenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide (PAβN), which is in fact not a typical inhibitor but a substrate for efflux pumps that is preferentially effluxed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of peptidomimetics, antibiotics and their combinations were determined by broth microdilution according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute performance standards (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2013). Based on previous studies indicating that among a range of tested antibiotics belonging to several classes azithromycin and rifampicin displayed a high propensity to synergize with peptides, and hence these antibiotics were chosen for the initial screening of peptidomimetics to identify possible antibiotic adjuvants (Jammal et al, 2015; Baker et al, 2016, 2018; Corbett et al, 2017; Lyu et al, 2017; Wu et al, 2017; Domalaon et al, 2018a,b; Yang et al, 2018). Here, a sub-MIC concentration of 0.5 μM peptidomimetic was tested in combination with 0.5 μg/mL rifampicin or 1 μg/mL azithromycin in 96-well plates, followed by inoculum addition according to CLSI guidelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the experiments on the mode of action is being done by conventional microbiological methods involving screening of antimicrobial compound by agar well diffusion assay, which are tedious and unwieldy (Balouiri et al, 2016). Nowadays, the application of high-throughput screening (HTS)with targeted cell-based assays, that carry reporters such as β-galactosidase or luciferase genes (Shobharani and Halami, 2016) for microbial compounds, is getting more popular and reliable (Baker et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%