2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta05737a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high-thermopower ionic hydrogel for intelligent fire protection

Abstract: High fire-safety and sensitive temperature-response materials are urgently needed for the development of intelligent fire protection. Herein, a multifunctional flame-retardant ionic hydrogel (HTIG) with high thermopower was fabricated via free-radical...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it seems that the pHRR even increased for the coated samples with the hydrogel. Jiang et al 99 developed a multifunctional high‐thermopower flame‐retardant ionic hydrogel with using poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA), acrylamide (AAm), 2‐acrylamide‐2‐methyl propane sulfonic acid (AMPSA), and calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ). This hydrogel was applied on wood and led to increase the LOI of wood from 27% to over 80%.…”
Section: Engineering Of Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it seems that the pHRR even increased for the coated samples with the hydrogel. Jiang et al 99 developed a multifunctional high‐thermopower flame‐retardant ionic hydrogel with using poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA), acrylamide (AAm), 2‐acrylamide‐2‐methyl propane sulfonic acid (AMPSA), and calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ). This hydrogel was applied on wood and led to increase the LOI of wood from 27% to over 80%.…”
Section: Engineering Of Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] We also compare fire-warning performances of MXene-based fire warning sensors with other fire-warning counterparts, e.g., GO-, CNTs-, biomass-, Ag-based sensors counterparts (Figure 24 and Table 6). [1,[17][18][19]23,29,116,117,[119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130] In terms of the fire detection response time or sensitivity, there are no significant differences between them, but MXene-, GO-, and biomass-based sensors demonstrate faster fire detection responses (within 2 s). For example, the PLCNF/gelatin/ MXene achieves a fire detection response time of 1 s, [117] and GO-PA paper shows a slightly quicker response (≈0.5 s), [122] but the CNTs-containing fiber filter presents a slower flame response of ≈5 s. [29] The slower fire response of CNTs-based sensors is mainly attributed to its different fire-warning mechanism.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fire Warning Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionic thermoelectric (iTE) materials driven by the Soret effect are receiving increasing interest in areas such as energy harvesting from low-grade heat and high-sensitivity sensors due to their giant thermopower (1)(2)(3). The ionic Seebeck coefficient (S i ) can reach an order of magnitude of 10 mV K −1 arising from thermal diffusion of ions under temperature gradients (4), which offers advantages of avoiding the use of a large number of thermoelements to magnify the signal output and producing more sensitive sensors compared to electronic thermoelectric materials (5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%