1988
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4203(88)90034-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high sensitivity method for the determination of nanomolar concentrations of Nitrate and Nitrite in seawater with a technicon autoanalyzer II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standards were prepared in DIW or in artificial seawater (ASW, NaC1 38 g 1-1), and precautions were taken during their analysis according to the recommendations of Kerouel and Aminot (1987). Since a seawater (artificial or natural) wash is absolutely essential when working at high gains (the use of DIW would cause "schlieren", i.e., density differences between the sample and the DIW seawater), its quality must be tested according to the following procedure: establish baseline with DIW and omit Reagent 2 (optical zero); run a sample of seawater used for the wash cycle and measure the refractive effect (Froelich and Pilson 1978) -referred to as "salt effect" by Oudot and Montel (1988); replace Reagent2 and run another sample of the seawater used for the wash cycle, the signal obtained indicates the refractive effect plus the nitrate content of the seawater; then determine the nitrate concentration of the seawater from the latter signal after substracting the refractive effect and applying a calibration factor obtained from the nitrate standards. This procedure indicated that ASW contained 5 to 20 nM nitrate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Standards were prepared in DIW or in artificial seawater (ASW, NaC1 38 g 1-1), and precautions were taken during their analysis according to the recommendations of Kerouel and Aminot (1987). Since a seawater (artificial or natural) wash is absolutely essential when working at high gains (the use of DIW would cause "schlieren", i.e., density differences between the sample and the DIW seawater), its quality must be tested according to the following procedure: establish baseline with DIW and omit Reagent 2 (optical zero); run a sample of seawater used for the wash cycle and measure the refractive effect (Froelich and Pilson 1978) -referred to as "salt effect" by Oudot and Montel (1988); replace Reagent2 and run another sample of the seawater used for the wash cycle, the signal obtained indicates the refractive effect plus the nitrate content of the seawater; then determine the nitrate concentration of the seawater from the latter signal after substracting the refractive effect and applying a calibration factor obtained from the nitrate standards. This procedure indicated that ASW contained 5 to 20 nM nitrate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(LCD culture; 5 000 cells ml-1, particulate nitrogen=0.75/~M) and a high cell-density culture (HCD culture; 100 000 cells ml-1, particulate nitrogen= 13/~M) of Skeletonema costatum limited in nitrogen (zero nitrate in the culture medium). Samples were drawn from the medium by suction through a 10/~m-mesh net via the sampling tube; this avoids the problem of contamination during sampling and transfer, as noted by Oudot and Montel (1988). To start the experiment, the medium was spiked with a low quantity of nitrate; i.e., 17 nM for the LCD culture (Fig.…”
Section: Laboratory Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inorganic nutrients were measured colorimetrically by Continuous Flow Analysis, by use of a six-channel Technicon-Bran Luebbe AA II AutoAnalizer. Nanomolar concentrations of nitrate were measured as described by Oudot and Montel (1988). After preliminary test CTD casts, incubators were set at the in situ temperature and irradiance found at four discrete depths: surface, thermocline, deep chlorophyll a maximum, and the depth receiving 1% of the surface irradiance (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several [27,28] or derivatization of the nitrate ion and detection in the visible region [29]. Indirect spectrophotometric methods require initial reduction of nitrate to nitrite by homogeneous [30,31] or heterogeneous [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] reduction methods using reduction columns of powdered or granular metals, e.g. zinc [32,33], amalgamated zinc [34], cadmium [35], amalgamated Cadmium [36,37] [22].…”
Section: On-board Computer Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%