2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gl069666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high‐resolution record of Greenland mass balance

Abstract: We map recent Greenland Ice Sheet elevation change at high spatial (5 km) and temporal (monthly) resolution using CryoSat‐2 altimetry. After correcting for the impact of changing snowpack properties associated with unprecedented surface melting in 2012, we find good agreement (3 cm/yr bias) with airborne measurements. With the aid of regional climate and firn modeling, we compute high spatial and temporal resolution records of Greenland mass evolution, which correlate (R = 0.96) with monthly satellite gravimet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
190
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
190
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent estimates suggest that the mass balance of the RHA was −6.9 ± 7.4 Gt between 2004(Matsuo and Heki, 2013 and that thinning rates increased to −0.40 ± 0.09 m a −1 between 2012/13 and 2014, compared to the long-term average of −0.23 ± 0.04 m a −1 (1952 and 2014) (Melkonian et al, 2016). The RHA is, therefore, following the Arctic-wide pattern of negative mass balance and glacier retreat that has been observed in Greenland (Enderlin et al, 2014;McMillan et al, 2016), Svalbard (Moholdt et al, 2010a, b;Nuth et al, 2010), and the Canadian Arctic (Enderlin et al, 2014;McMillan et al, 2016). However, the RHA has been studied far less than other Arctic regions, despite its large ice volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…More recent estimates suggest that the mass balance of the RHA was −6.9 ± 7.4 Gt between 2004(Matsuo and Heki, 2013 and that thinning rates increased to −0.40 ± 0.09 m a −1 between 2012/13 and 2014, compared to the long-term average of −0.23 ± 0.04 m a −1 (1952 and 2014) (Melkonian et al, 2016). The RHA is, therefore, following the Arctic-wide pattern of negative mass balance and glacier retreat that has been observed in Greenland (Enderlin et al, 2014;McMillan et al, 2016), Svalbard (Moholdt et al, 2010a, b;Nuth et al, 2010), and the Canadian Arctic (Enderlin et al, 2014;McMillan et al, 2016). However, the RHA has been studied far less than other Arctic regions, despite its large ice volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Dynamic ice losses were roughly equal to surface melt and runoff in the period 2000-2008, but the share was somewhat less during the exceptionally high-surface melt years of 2009-2012. Taken together, dynamic ice losses and runoff of surface meltwater exceed snow accumulation over the Greenland Ice Sheet, so the overall mass balance of the ice sheet is negative. Analysis of surface elevation and mass changes from CryoSat-2 and GRACE satellite data indicates that the Greenland Ice Sheet had a net annual mass balance of − 269 ± 51 Gt/year from Jan 2011-Dec 2014 [14]. Dynamic ice loss from marine outlet glaciers makes a large contribution to this deficit, particularly from Kangerdlugssuaq in the east, Jakobshavns Isbrae, Upernavik Isstrøm and Steenstrup Glacier on the west coast, and Zachariae Isstrøm in the north-east.…”
Section: Contribution Of Calving Glaciers To Greenland's Mass Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to directly removing more of the ice sheet into the sea, melting reduces the reflectivity of the ice sheet and can warm the perennial snowpack (through latent heat release when the meltwater refreezes), both of which act as a positive feedback to further enhance melt. These processes also alter the dielectric properties of the ice sheet surface, which makes it more difficult to measure surface height change using satellite-borne radar instruments (McMillan et al, 2016). An understanding of the location, frequency, duration and magnitude of melting is therefore necessary to (1) understand the ice sheet's response to climate change, (2) interpret contemporary measurements of ice sheet volume change and (3) constrain predictions of future ice sheet state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%