2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high pressure experimental and numerical study of methane ignition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bushe [19], Kim et al [20], Huang et al [21] and Merhubi et al [22]. The Mech_56.54 mechanism tends to capture the overall trend of i variations better than those of the GRI Mech3.0 model, particularly at the lower temperatures.…”
Section: Reduced Global Schemementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bushe [19], Kim et al [20], Huang et al [21] and Merhubi et al [22]. The Mech_56.54 mechanism tends to capture the overall trend of i variations better than those of the GRI Mech3.0 model, particularly at the lower temperatures.…”
Section: Reduced Global Schemementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The experiments were performed with mixtures of mhx3d (1 %) + O2 diluted in argon at equivalence ratios of  = 0.6, 1.2 and 2.4. The experimental facility represents a stainless-steel tube with an inner diameter of 50 mm and separated by a double stainless-steel diaphragm into two parts, the driver section (4 m in length) and the driven section (5 m in length) [29]. The facility is shown schematically in Supplementary Material 2 Fig.…”
Section: Ignition Delay Times Measurements In a Shock Tubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of experimental data in the literature for the previously-mentioned conditions and mixture compositions, an indirect approach is applied in order to validate the computations. In total, 31 experimental datasets from the literature [58,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] are used, as depicted in Table 3, in order to validate the chosen mechanisms (Table 2) at atmospheric conditions, as well as at elevated temperatures (up to 2085 K) and pressures (up to 5.1 MPa). The validation results are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fundamental Combustion Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%