2022
DOI: 10.31223/x58k95
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-order Accurate Summation-by-Parts Finite Difference Method for Fully-dynamic Earthquake Sequence Simulations within Sedimentary Basins

Abstract: We present a computationally efficient numerical method for earthquake sequences that incorporates wave propagation during rupture. A vertical strike-slip fault governed by rate-and-state friction is embedded in a heterogeneous elastic half-space discretized using a high-order accurate Summation-by-Parts finite difference method. We develop a two solver approach: Adaptive time-stepping is applied during the interseismic periods and during coseismic rupture we apply a non-stiff method, which enables a variety … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use an implicit backward differentiation formula, which takes time steps much longer than the Courant‐Friedrichs‐Lewy condition when the solution is evolving slowly. This avoids the efficiency limitations of explicit time‐stepping (Erickson & Nordström, 2014) and the difficulties of switching methods between coseismic and interseismic intervals (Harvey et al., 2023). We chose error tolerances and mesh sizes (Figure 2) based on convergence testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use an implicit backward differentiation formula, which takes time steps much longer than the Courant‐Friedrichs‐Lewy condition when the solution is evolving slowly. This avoids the efficiency limitations of explicit time‐stepping (Erickson & Nordström, 2014) and the difficulties of switching methods between coseismic and interseismic intervals (Harvey et al., 2023). We chose error tolerances and mesh sizes (Figure 2) based on convergence testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%