2017 30th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/sibgrapi.2017.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hierarchical Network Simplification via Non-Negative Matrix Factorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our data is represented as a graph, one option would be the watershed cuts algorithm [36], inspired by the well known image processing segmentation and equally prone to over segmentation. Considering that the processing time is also a relevant factor, we opted for an heuristic variation of the maximum weighted matching algorithm called sorted maximal matching [37], which merges clusters based on the weights of the edges between pairs of clusters.…”
Section: Data Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since our data is represented as a graph, one option would be the watershed cuts algorithm [36], inspired by the well known image processing segmentation and equally prone to over segmentation. Considering that the processing time is also a relevant factor, we opted for an heuristic variation of the maximum weighted matching algorithm called sorted maximal matching [37], which merges clusters based on the weights of the edges between pairs of clusters.…”
Section: Data Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graph is generated combining the original census data, encoding the changing geographical information. The graph is partitioned into an hierarchy [37]. The characteristics and evolution of the clusters are then visually represented.…”
Section: Cluster Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 12 shows two node-link diagrams with different levels of visual clutter. To reduce clutter in node-link diagrams, a number of strategies can be employed, from methods to change nodes' positions, such as force-based and circular algorithms (SIX;TOLLIS, 2006;BATTISTA et al, 1994;MI et al, 2016), to hierarchical simplification (DIAS et al, 2017) and edge-bundling strategies (HOLTEN; WIJK, 2009; LAMBERT; BOURQUI; AUBER, 2010; LHUILLIER; HURTER; TELEA, 2017). Less visual information usually leads to less visual clutter, and so strategies such as node ordering, edge sampling, and temporal resolution change can benefit visual exploration.…”
Section: Visual Clutter In Temporal Network Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%