2020
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1750414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hierarchical Max-Infinitely Divisible Spatial Model for Extreme Precipitation

Abstract: Understanding the spatial extent of extreme precipitation is necessary for determining flood risk and adequately designing infrastructure (e.g., stormwater pipes) to withstand such hazards. While environmental phenomena typically exhibit weakening spatial dependence at increasingly extreme levels, limiting max-stable process models for block maxima have a rigid dependence structure that does not capture this type of behavior. We propose a flexible Bayesian model from a broader family of (conditionally) max-inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, we could assume that the prior for 1/ c (or β) is a mixture between a continuous distribution on (0, ∞ ) and a point mass at zero. In the Bayesian context, the recent work of Bopp et al (2020) proposes a hierarchical max‐id model extending the max‐stable Reich and Shaby (2012) model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, we could assume that the prior for 1/ c (or β) is a mixture between a continuous distribution on (0, ∞ ) and a point mass at zero. In the Bayesian context, the recent work of Bopp et al (2020) proposes a hierarchical max‐id model extending the max‐stable Reich and Shaby (2012) model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we always need to choose a finite, and often relatively small, block size, which casts doubts on the validity of the max‐stability assumption in practice. A fast growing body of empirical studies on environmental extremes in the literature has indeed revealed that the max‐stability assumption arising asymptotically is often violated at finite levels (Bopp, Shaby, & Huser, 2020), and that the spatial dependence strength is often weakening as events become more extreme (see, e.g., Bacro, Gaetan, Opitz, & Toulemonde, 2020; Castro‐Camilo & Huser, 2020; Castro‐Camilo, Mhalla, & Opitz, 2020; Davison, Huser, & Thibaud, 2013; Huser, Opitz, & Thibaud, 2017; Huser & Wadsworth, 2020; Tawn, Shooter, Towe, & Lamb, 2018). In particular, under asymptotic independence , maxima become ultimately independent at the highest levels, requiring specialized models capturing the decay rate towards independence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the χ statistic is a measure of pairwise tail dependence and hence not able to describe the higher-order extremal dependence. Second, χ is an appropriate extremal dependence metric in the case of asymptotic dependence, it is less clear about the usefulness of this measure if the environmental process of interest exhibits weakening spatial dependence as events become more extreme (Huser et al 2017;Wadsworth et al 2017;Huser and Wadsworth 2018;Bopp et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Max-stable and Pareto processes are asymptotically justified models for spatial extremes, but likelihood computations are usually challenging, even for low or moderate spatial dimensions (see, e.g., Castruccio, Huser and Genton (2016) and ). An exception is the max-stable model of Reich and Shaby (2012) which is computationally tractable for higher spatial dimensions; see also Bopp, Shaby and Huser (2021). However, this max-stable model has been criticized for its lack of flexibility in a variety of applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%