2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3290613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hierarchical Intrusion Detection Model Combining Multiple Deep Learning Models With Attention Mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results with the CICDDoS2019 dataset showed the superiority of the proposed models under human expertise over most previous works ( [19], [24], [43]) in terms of accuracy, precision, and FPR with 99.80%, 99.98%, and 0.085% for the CNN and 99.76%, 99.99%, and 0.046% for the BiLSTM+LSTM, respectively. However, a DFNN model developed by the authors in [42] demonstrated a slight superiority in accuracy (99.94%) but a lower precision (99.95%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results with the CICDDoS2019 dataset showed the superiority of the proposed models under human expertise over most previous works ( [19], [24], [43]) in terms of accuracy, precision, and FPR with 99.80%, 99.98%, and 0.085% for the CNN and 99.76%, 99.99%, and 0.046% for the BiLSTM+LSTM, respectively. However, a DFNN model developed by the authors in [42] demonstrated a slight superiority in accuracy (99.94%) but a lower precision (99.95%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The results with the CICIDS2017 dataset also proved the efficiency of the proposed framework in intrusion detection and false alarm mitigation. The proposed models under human expertise outperformed the recent works of [24], [25], and [41] in terms of accuracy and precision with 99.76% and 99.60% for the CNN and 99.88% and 99.86% for the BiLSTM+LSTM, respectively. However, the authors of [27] and [29] developed two models that slightly outperformed our models in terms of accuracy and precision, with 99.96% and 99.96% accuracy and precision for the first model and 99.99% and 99.99%, respectively, for the second model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CNN architecture involves convolutional layers for feature extraction, pooling layers for dimensionality reduction, and fully connected layers for classification. Activation functions such as Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) are applied to introduce non-linearity to the model [2]. Parameters like the number of hot indicators and the number of failed login attempts from the KDD Cup 1999 dataset contribute to its success [1].…”
Section: ) Convolutional Neural Network (Cnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• BiLSTM: This model employs two LSTMs, one of which processes the sequence forward and the other in reverse. Through this bidirectional process, BiLSTM increases the amount of information available to the network, which can be valuable in traffic classification problems where comprehending relationships between various traffic features is essential [43]. Figure 6 shows the architecture of the BiLSTM model.…”
Section: Deep Learning Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%