2016 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ictc.2016.7763281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical anchor selection scheme for distributed mobile network architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the performance metrics for IP networks are directly related to how this resource is used effectively. In the literature, there are several studies discussing the IP allocation and topology construction methods in different fields 6,7 . The common characteristic of these studies is that they propose new allocation schemes by considering the traditional hierarchical structure of IP addresses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the performance metrics for IP networks are directly related to how this resource is used effectively. In the literature, there are several studies discussing the IP allocation and topology construction methods in different fields 6,7 . The common characteristic of these studies is that they propose new allocation schemes by considering the traditional hierarchical structure of IP addresses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common characteristic of these studies is that they propose new allocation schemes by considering the traditional hierarchical structure of IP addresses. For example, Sun and Kim propose a new IP allocation procedure for mobile distributed network architecture for the mobility management case, DMM 6 . In this case‐specific study, the authors divide the IP address blocks into the groups with the hierarchical manner and observe that the allocation costs for each different IP groups are different.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%