2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical algorithm for calculating the isotopic fine structures of molecules

Abstract: This article presents a memory efficient algorithm for accurately calculating the isotopic fine structures of molecules. Treating individual isotopic species of a molecule as different mass states, we introduce the concept of transitions between mass states and represent all mass states of the molecule in a hierarchical structure. We show that there exists a simple relationship between two different mass states at two different levels of the hierarchical structure. This allows us to efficiently and accurately … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IsoPro and NeutronCluster report a peak with the smallest mass, followed by Mercury, Emass, IsoDalton, and BRAIN. Depending on the shape of the true aggregated isotopic distribution, the different number and location of the reported peaks may lead to a difference between the value of the average mass computed for a particular algorithm and the theoretical value, obtained from Equation (25). For the case presented in Figure 1, the difference is small, though visible for IsoPro.…”
Section: Results Of the Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IsoPro and NeutronCluster report a peak with the smallest mass, followed by Mercury, Emass, IsoDalton, and BRAIN. Depending on the shape of the true aggregated isotopic distribution, the different number and location of the reported peaks may lead to a difference between the value of the average mass computed for a particular algorithm and the theoretical value, obtained from Equation (25). For the case presented in Figure 1, the difference is small, though visible for IsoPro.…”
Section: Results Of the Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The average mass is computed according to the following definition: Table 4 presents the results of the comparison of the theoretical average mass, as computed in Equation (25), and the weighted average based upon the predicted masses and occurrence probabilities for all peaks returned by a particular algorithm. There is virtually no difference between the two average values for BRAIN and for Emass.…”
Section: Results Of the Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values do not directly reflect turnover rates because they underestimate degradation of heavy 15 N species and hence the actual synthesis/degradation rate (36). They do also not reflect the % of 15 N incorporation (57, 58), a complex calculation process that is not available in an automated manner and thus not implemented here. Nevertheless, RIA also called q-value has often been used as the basis for turnover calculations (59, 60).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In collaborating Dr. Agar of Chem istry at Brandeis, we have developed new tools for analyzing mass spectrometry data (Li, Kresh et al 2008) (Karabacak, Li et al 2009). …”
Section: (C) Mass Spectrometry Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%