2016
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hidden Markov model approach to analyze longitudinal ternary outcomes when some observed states are possibly misclassified

Abstract: Summary Understanding the dynamic disease process is vital in early detection, diagnosis, and measuring progression. Continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) methods have been used to estimate state change intensities but challenges arise when stages are potentially misclassified. We present an analytical likelihood approach where the hidden state is modeled as a three-state CTMC model allowing for some observed states to be possibly misclassified. Covariate effects of the hidden process and misclassification proba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifiability of this model follows from [1]. However, real applications have a different form for the entries of the transition matrix, see for example [2,4]. Here we are interested in how identifiability can be investigated in such cases.…”
Section: Example 3: Longitudinal Hmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifiability of this model follows from [1]. However, real applications have a different form for the entries of the transition matrix, see for example [2,4]. Here we are interested in how identifiability can be investigated in such cases.…”
Section: Example 3: Longitudinal Hmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the previous value of time-varying covariates could be used to assess transitions, however, longer lags in covariate patterns would violate the Markovian assumption. Lastly, initial state probabilities may be treated as nuisance parameters when inference is focused on transitions, similar to our setting (Benoit et al, 2016), assumed to be subject-specific, or specified to depend on baseline covariates (Zhou et al, 2020). We assume similar initial state probabilities, π 1 , across all subjects, In our simulation study below, we demonstrate the model’s insensitivity to this assumption on variable selection performance for transitions and emissions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proposed joint model, problems of identifiability and estimability of parameters may occur due to the presence of a CTMC. As noted in Benoit et al , a CTMC model may be non‐identifiable (i.e., two or more set of parameters could result in a very close likelihood) when outcomes are recorded at prespecified times. This is because the sojourn time and state of change for a subject are not fully recorded; that is, their Markov chain observations do not record the exact duration of the sojourn time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%