Abstract:Laser ablation ICP‐MS U–Pb dating on inherited zircons from Neogene volcanic rocks of the Tafresh area in the central part of Urumieh‐Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (UDMA) yielded Paleoproterozoic, Late Neoproterozoic–Early Cambrian, Carboniferous, and Cretaceous ages. These ages improve our understanding of the geodynamical evolution of central UDMA. The 2,379 Ma age (i.e., Paleoproterozoic) is the oldest age reported in the central UDMA and is similar to the age of detrital zircons from Central Iran. The Paleoproteroz… Show more
“…Cretaceous volcano-sedimentary sequences are the oldest rock units that crop out near to the study area; however, the presence of older crustal rocks is suggested by the inherited zircons retrieved from volcanic rocks in the present study. Palaeoproterozoic, Neoproterozoic-early Cambrian, Palaeozoic and Mesozoic ages (Hassanzadeh et al 2008;Chaharlang & Ghorbani, 2020) obtained for inherited zircons from igneous rocks imply the presence of older crustal materials underlying the Alborz, Sanandaj-Sirjan and Central Iran tectonomagmatic zones. Igneous rocks in the study area entirely comprise Tertiary magmatic rocks, including Eocene, Oligocene and Miocene rock units (Figs 2, 3).…”
Section: Geological Overviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A few Palaeoproterozoic zircons indicate the incorporation of older crustal materials (i.e. those derived from the African craton and supplied by Central Iran sedimentary beds) in the late Neoproterozoicearly Cambrian magmatism (Chaharlang & Ghorbani, 2020). The presence of 1870 Ma detrital zircons in the Tashk Formation siliciclastic rocks (Ramezani & Tucker,Fig.…”
Section: Degree Of Crustal Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zircons straddling the Carboniferous are regarded as being derived from the Eurasian arc, which resulted from Palaeotethyan oceanic plate subduction towards the north. The Cretaceous zircons indicate a Late Cretaceous magmatic episode that followed Neotethyan subduction (Chaharlang & Ghorbani, 2020).…”
Section: Degree Of Crustal Contaminationmentioning
AbstractSignificant uncertainty remains regarding the exact timing and nature of subduction events during the closure of the Tethyan seas in what is now NW Iran. This study thus presents new geochemical compositions and U–Pb ages for a suite of volcanic rocks emplaced during Cenozoic volcanism in the west Alborz Magmatic Assemblage, which is commonly regarded as the back-arc of the Neotethyan magmatism in Central Iran. The subalkali basalts and andesites are dated to 57 ± 1.2 Ma, and are likely derived from a supra-subduction mantle wedge. Later, trachytic A-type rocks erupted from ~42 to 25 Ma during an anorogenic (extensional) stage triggered by slab retreat and associated asthenospheric mantle influx. A-type melts were at least partly concurrent with lithospheric mantle magmatism implied by eruption of subalkali basalts–andesites around 26–24 Ma. Next, Amp-Bt trachybasaltic volcanism with high-Nb basaltic affinity at ~19 Ma likely records slab deepening and slab partial melting, which reacted with the mantle wedge to produce the source material for the high-Nb basalts. Sr–Nd isotopic ratios for SE Ahar mafic as well as A-type rocks imply rather enriched mantle source(s). Some crustal contamination is implied by the presence of inherited zircons dominated by those derived from Neoproterozoic–Cambrian basement rocks and Carboniferous magmatism. Rhyolitic rocks with adakitic affinity probably mark the final volcanism in the study area. The adakitic rocks show crustal signatures such as high K and Th, probably formed as a consequence of higher temperature gradients, at crustal levels, imposed by both slab and mantle partial melts.
“…Cretaceous volcano-sedimentary sequences are the oldest rock units that crop out near to the study area; however, the presence of older crustal rocks is suggested by the inherited zircons retrieved from volcanic rocks in the present study. Palaeoproterozoic, Neoproterozoic-early Cambrian, Palaeozoic and Mesozoic ages (Hassanzadeh et al 2008;Chaharlang & Ghorbani, 2020) obtained for inherited zircons from igneous rocks imply the presence of older crustal materials underlying the Alborz, Sanandaj-Sirjan and Central Iran tectonomagmatic zones. Igneous rocks in the study area entirely comprise Tertiary magmatic rocks, including Eocene, Oligocene and Miocene rock units (Figs 2, 3).…”
Section: Geological Overviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A few Palaeoproterozoic zircons indicate the incorporation of older crustal materials (i.e. those derived from the African craton and supplied by Central Iran sedimentary beds) in the late Neoproterozoicearly Cambrian magmatism (Chaharlang & Ghorbani, 2020). The presence of 1870 Ma detrital zircons in the Tashk Formation siliciclastic rocks (Ramezani & Tucker,Fig.…”
Section: Degree Of Crustal Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zircons straddling the Carboniferous are regarded as being derived from the Eurasian arc, which resulted from Palaeotethyan oceanic plate subduction towards the north. The Cretaceous zircons indicate a Late Cretaceous magmatic episode that followed Neotethyan subduction (Chaharlang & Ghorbani, 2020).…”
Section: Degree Of Crustal Contaminationmentioning
AbstractSignificant uncertainty remains regarding the exact timing and nature of subduction events during the closure of the Tethyan seas in what is now NW Iran. This study thus presents new geochemical compositions and U–Pb ages for a suite of volcanic rocks emplaced during Cenozoic volcanism in the west Alborz Magmatic Assemblage, which is commonly regarded as the back-arc of the Neotethyan magmatism in Central Iran. The subalkali basalts and andesites are dated to 57 ± 1.2 Ma, and are likely derived from a supra-subduction mantle wedge. Later, trachytic A-type rocks erupted from ~42 to 25 Ma during an anorogenic (extensional) stage triggered by slab retreat and associated asthenospheric mantle influx. A-type melts were at least partly concurrent with lithospheric mantle magmatism implied by eruption of subalkali basalts–andesites around 26–24 Ma. Next, Amp-Bt trachybasaltic volcanism with high-Nb basaltic affinity at ~19 Ma likely records slab deepening and slab partial melting, which reacted with the mantle wedge to produce the source material for the high-Nb basalts. Sr–Nd isotopic ratios for SE Ahar mafic as well as A-type rocks imply rather enriched mantle source(s). Some crustal contamination is implied by the presence of inherited zircons dominated by those derived from Neoproterozoic–Cambrian basement rocks and Carboniferous magmatism. Rhyolitic rocks with adakitic affinity probably mark the final volcanism in the study area. The adakitic rocks show crustal signatures such as high K and Th, probably formed as a consequence of higher temperature gradients, at crustal levels, imposed by both slab and mantle partial melts.
“…Another criticism that may arise against this article is extending the volcanic activity in the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic arc (UDMA) to Jurassic -Lower Cretaceous; while its exposed rocks not older than Paleocene in Iran. My justification is shown in three facts: the first is the recent conclusion of Chaharlang and Ghorbani (2020) [73] that a volcanic activity occurred on UDMA during the Cretaceous (106 m.y.). The second is the extensive erosion of the rocks of the UDMA during the Jurassic-Early Cretaceous due to the availability of large accommodation space for sediments transport to the deep basin (Fig.…”
Section: The Most Serious Challenge To This Studymentioning
In the Iraqi Zagros, there are ten ophiolites and basaltic bodies, the famous ones are Penjween, Mawat, Bulfat and Peshashan Ophiolite complexes in addition to basaltic bodies such as Kata Rash, Avroman, Gercus, Chalki, and Hamrin basaltic bodies. The present study describes more than 12 significant problems concerning the previous assigning of the bodies as igneous rocks. These problems are observable in the field, laboratory, and in most previous works of literature that oppose the magmatic origin of these bodies. Our study explicated all aspects of each problem and clarified how the problems contradict magmatic crystallization and aid the sedimentary origin of these claimed igneous bodies. Finally, the interpretations of all the problems were collected as conjugate pieces of evidence for appraisal of the new origin of all igneous bodies in the Iraqi and Iranian Zagros belt. The outcomes consider the ophiolitic and basaltic rocks metamorphosed volcaniclastic sandstones (greywackes or mafic sandstone). These sandstones belong to fresh or metamorphosed greywackes of stratigraphic units of the Paleocene-Eocene Walash Formation (as distal facies) and Kata Rash Conglomerate (as proximal facies) which were previously considered volcanic rocks. These sediments are sourced originally from Urumeiah-Dokhtur Magmatic Arc (ADMA) and deposited inside Neo-Tethys, present Sanandaji-Sirjan Zone (SSZ), during the Jurassic-Early Cretaceous. Later, the sediments were metamorphosed and uplifted during the Paleocene and deposited inside the Iraqi Zagros belt by turbidity currents inside the Zagros Foreland basin. These ideas are shown in detail by tectonic and paleogeographic models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.