2007
DOI: 10.1364/ao.46.006498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heuristic technique for CTIS image reconstruction

Abstract: An iterative method is presented for computed tomography imaging spectrometer (CTIS) image reconstruction in the presence of both photon noise in the image and postdetection Gaussian system noise. The new algorithm, which assumes the transfer matrix of the system has a particular structure, is evaluated experimentally with the result that it is significantly better, for larger problems, than both the multiplicative algebraic reconstruction technique (MART) and the mixed-expectation image-reconstruction techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then complex algorithms, related to computed tomography (CT)-reconstruction algorithms, are used to extract a spectral cube from this overlapping projected data. Drawbacks of this approach include the complexity of the reconstruction algorithms rendering real-time visualization impossible and the limited resolution of the spectral cube, with pixel counts of unrolled cubes varying from 4.2% of the size of the sensor [9] to 22-64% of the size of the sensor [10]. Moreover, its main limitation as a snapshot instrument is due to the nature of its ill-posed process of acquisition of limited angle projection tomography.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then complex algorithms, related to computed tomography (CT)-reconstruction algorithms, are used to extract a spectral cube from this overlapping projected data. Drawbacks of this approach include the complexity of the reconstruction algorithms rendering real-time visualization impossible and the limited resolution of the spectral cube, with pixel counts of unrolled cubes varying from 4.2% of the size of the sensor [9] to 22-64% of the size of the sensor [10]. Moreover, its main limitation as a snapshot instrument is due to the nature of its ill-posed process of acquisition of limited angle projection tomography.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c, respectively, and a true RGB image of the ColorChecker is shown in As CTIS images are compressed and not as easy to analyze as hyperspectral cubes, fast and precise real-time reconstruction of the hyperspectral cube from a CTIS image is an important but challenging goal. In practice, the common dimension of the hyperspectral cube often exceeds 100 × 100 × 100, resulting in long reconstruction times and mediocre accuracy for existing algorithms [14][15][16]. Therefore, we consider neural networks to circumvent the limitations of current reconstruction algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15) pixels between the nearby hyperspectral cubes along the vertical (horizontal) direction on 2-D images, i.e., strides =(10,15) for the cropping window. By doing so, the network is beneficially allowed to see many more different combinations of original hyperspectral cubes without incurring an enormous dataset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18,22 Since potential applications for CTIS are embedded realtime or near-realtime systems, a better reconstruction algorithm is needed. Previous attempts at speeding up the reconstruction algorithm have been performed by Hagen 18 and Vose-Horton 1,23 where they developed fast reconstruction algorithms exploiting spatial shift-invariance (hereafter referred to as shift-invariance). Additionally, hardware accelerations were performed by Thompson 22 and Sethaphong 24 using cell processors and supercomputers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%