2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heuristic framework for the bi-objective enhanced index tracking problem

Abstract: The index tracking problem is the problem of determining a portfolio of assets whose performance replicates, as closely as possible, that of a financial market index chosen as benchmark. In the enhanced index tracking problem the portfolio is expected to outperform the benchmark with minimal additional risk. In this paper, we study the bi-objective enhanced index tracking problem where two competing objectives, i.e., the expected excess return of the portfolio over the benchmark and the tracking error, are tak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their model includes, among other features, a cardinality constraint and buy-in threshold limits, and is solved by means of an immunitybased multi-objective algorithm. Filippi et al [6] cast the EITP as a bi-objective MILP model with several real features, including a cardinality constraint and buy-in threshold limits on the shares. Their optimization model aims at maximizing the excess return of the portfolio over the benchmark, while minimizing the tracking error, as measured by the absolute deviation between the portfolio and benchmark values.…”
Section: Recent Literature On the Enhanced Index Tracking Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their model includes, among other features, a cardinality constraint and buy-in threshold limits, and is solved by means of an immunitybased multi-objective algorithm. Filippi et al [6] cast the EITP as a bi-objective MILP model with several real features, including a cardinality constraint and buy-in threshold limits on the shares. Their optimization model aims at maximizing the excess return of the portfolio over the benchmark, while minimizing the tracking error, as measured by the absolute deviation between the portfolio and benchmark values.…”
Section: Recent Literature On the Enhanced Index Tracking Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canakgoz and Beasley (2009) review the differences between EIM and IRM. EIM chases excess returns when minimizing tracking errors (Roman et al, 2013;Filippi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is one strand of literature that treats EIM as a multi-objective decision model. For example, Filippi et al (2016) and Wu et al (2007) convert EIM to a bi-objective model, Anagnostopoulos and Mamanis (2010) and Hirschberger et al (2013) convert it to a tri-objective model. However, the issue here is that the optimal solution set to a multi-objective optimization typically has very high or even infinite dimensional cardinality.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bruni et al (2015) model the EITP as a bi-objective linear program that maximizes the average excess return of the portfolio over the benchmark, and minimizes the maximum downside deviation of the portfolio return from the market index. Filippi et al (2016) cast the EITP as a bi-objective mixed-integer LP model which maximizes the excess return of the portfolio over the benchmark, and minimizes the tracking error, here defined as the absolute deviation between the portfolio and benchmark values. The authors devise a bi-objective heuristic framework for its solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%