1995
DOI: 10.1006/geno.1995.1066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Heterozygous Putative Null Mutation in ROM1 without a Mutation in Peripherin/RDS in a Family with Retinitis Pigmentosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gene was initially reported in digenic RP with PRPH2 mutation [78] and then implicated in a family with monogenic RP (c.339dupG p.(L114Afs*18)) [79]. However pathogenicity of mutations in ROM1 is still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gene was initially reported in digenic RP with PRPH2 mutation [78] and then implicated in a family with monogenic RP (c.339dupG p.(L114Afs*18)) [79]. However pathogenicity of mutations in ROM1 is still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clones from our human retinal cDNA library [8] were used to construct the interactive trap cDNA library (prey library) for the yeast two‐hybrid strategy. A number of important retina‐specific and ‐enriched clones has been isolated from this library, indicating the suitability of this library for construction of the prey library [1,8,10–12]. 80 000 primary clones were obtained in the prey library with an average insert size of 1.7 kb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…One study on the digenic form of RP demonstrated that this p.L114Afs*18 mutation in ROM1 was a null mutation and only when combined with the p.L185P mutation in PRPH2 in double heterozygous state could cause RP (3). The mutation was also reported in adRP with different disease severities, and even when asymptomatic may be due to penetrance and expressivity of the disease or other reasons (16)(17)(18). It was detected in a patient with adRP and 2 out of 240 normal subjects in another study, which indicated that the mutation was not the causative mutation for the patient (18).…”
Section: Candidate Mutations In the Probandmentioning
confidence: 93%