2016
DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heterozygous 21-bp deletion inCAPN3causes dominantly inherited limb girdle muscular dystrophy

Abstract: Limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A is the most common limb girdle muscular dystrophy form worldwide. Although strict recessive inheritance is assumed, patients carrying a single mutation in the calpain 3 gene (CAPN3) are reported. Such findings are commonly attributed to incomplete mutation screening. In this investigation, we report 37 individuals (age range: 21-85 years, 21 females and 16 males) from 10 families in whom only one mutation in CAPN3 could be identified; a 21-bp, in-frame deletion (c.643_663… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
101
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This variant, a 21 bp in‐frame deletion c.643_663del21, cosegregates in 37 individuals from 10 families with muscle disease and dominant‐transmission through several generations. Moreover, it is associated with severe loss of calpain3 expression shown by immunoblotting, suggesting a dominant‐negative effect on calpain3 homodimer 33. In our large‐scale study, the identification of the same 21 bp in‐frame deletion in 17 individuals (Table 2) without any reportable second variant further confirms the c.643_663del21 as a common, dominant mutation, but further deletion‐duplication analysis did not occur.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This variant, a 21 bp in‐frame deletion c.643_663del21, cosegregates in 37 individuals from 10 families with muscle disease and dominant‐transmission through several generations. Moreover, it is associated with severe loss of calpain3 expression shown by immunoblotting, suggesting a dominant‐negative effect on calpain3 homodimer 33. In our large‐scale study, the identification of the same 21 bp in‐frame deletion in 17 individuals (Table 2) without any reportable second variant further confirms the c.643_663del21 as a common, dominant mutation, but further deletion‐duplication analysis did not occur.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This variant occurred in multiple different families with muscle disease, segregating with dominant inheritance 32, 33, 34. A second 15 bp in‐frame deletion (c.598_612del15) was also identified in different 16 unrelated patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If, on the other hand, the mutant allele of a gene would suppress the expression of the wild-type allele, as was the case in a patient with an intragenic deletion in the CNTNAP2 gene, significantly less than 50% of wild-type transcript would remain [Lee et al, 2015]. The latter may be the case with the in-frame deletion of CAPN3 [Vissing et al, 2016]. However plausible these explanations for dominant effects of mutations in transmembrane or dimerization domains of proteins may seem, they need corroboration by functional studies.…”
Section: When Recessive Genes Mutate To Dominant Gene Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent publications challenge this relatively clear-cut picture and may even 'blur the borders of dominant and recessive inheritance' [Lemke et al, 2016;Vissing et al, 2016].…”
Section: When Recessive Genes Mutate To Dominant Gene Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation