2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heterologous DNA prime/protein boost immunization strategy for rhesus cytomegalovirus

Abstract: A previous study in nonhuman primates demonstrated that genetic immunization against the rhesus cytomegalovirus phosphoprotein 65-2 (pp65-2) and glycoprotein B (gB) antigens both stimulated antigen-specific antibodies and CD8 T cell responses, and significantly reduced plasma viral loads following intravenous challenge with RhCMV. It was also noted in this study that weak CD4 T cell and neutralizing antibody responses were generated by DNA alone. To broaden the type of immune responses, a DNA prime/protein boo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animals were divided into four vaccine treatment groups as shown in Table 1: group 1 (n ϭ 6), mock-immunized controls; group 2 (n ϭ 6), animals immunized against RhCMV gB; group 3 (n ϭ 6), animals immunized against RhCMV gB, pp65-2, and IE1; and group 4 (n ϭ 3), animals immunized against RhCMV gB, pp65-2, and IE1 and boosted with formalin-inactivated RhCMV (FI-RhCMV) virions. Although group 4 was comprised of a smaller number of monkeys than the other groups (n ϭ 3 versus n ϭ 6), the goal was to provide a comparison of viral outcomes after challenge in this study with our previous study using RhCMV 68-1 as the challenge virus (2). The backbone pND expression vector and the expression plasmids for RhCMV pp65-2 (pND/65-2), the transmembrane deletion version of gB (pND/gB⌬TM), and RhCMV IE1 (exons 2 to 4) have been described previously (2,27,46,49).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Animals were divided into four vaccine treatment groups as shown in Table 1: group 1 (n ϭ 6), mock-immunized controls; group 2 (n ϭ 6), animals immunized against RhCMV gB; group 3 (n ϭ 6), animals immunized against RhCMV gB, pp65-2, and IE1; and group 4 (n ϭ 3), animals immunized against RhCMV gB, pp65-2, and IE1 and boosted with formalin-inactivated RhCMV (FI-RhCMV) virions. Although group 4 was comprised of a smaller number of monkeys than the other groups (n ϭ 3 versus n ϭ 6), the goal was to provide a comparison of viral outcomes after challenge in this study with our previous study using RhCMV 68-1 as the challenge virus (2). The backbone pND expression vector and the expression plasmids for RhCMV pp65-2 (pND/65-2), the transmembrane deletion version of gB (pND/gB⌬TM), and RhCMV IE1 (exons 2 to 4) have been described previously (2,27,46,49).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although group 4 was comprised of a smaller number of monkeys than the other groups (n ϭ 3 versus n ϭ 6), the goal was to provide a comparison of viral outcomes after challenge in this study with our previous study using RhCMV 68-1 as the challenge virus (2). The backbone pND expression vector and the expression plasmids for RhCMV pp65-2 (pND/65-2), the transmembrane deletion version of gB (pND/gB⌬TM), and RhCMV IE1 (exons 2 to 4) have been described previously (2,27,46,49). All expression plasmids were purified from bacteria using Endo-free plasmid extraction kits (Qiagen).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations