2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hedonic analysis of the impact of LUST sites on house prices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zabel and Guignet [32] 1996-2007 Maryland Leaking underground storage tanks When a leak site is found, local properties prices will plunge by 5%. The negative effect will increase after public inquiry.…”
Section: Study Period and Region Facilities/ Activities Effects On Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zabel and Guignet [32] 1996-2007 Maryland Leaking underground storage tanks When a leak site is found, local properties prices will plunge by 5%. The negative effect will increase after public inquiry.…”
Section: Study Period and Region Facilities/ Activities Effects On Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the required variables from SFUN and Google Maps including housing prices, sale state, trading year, property location, property area, greening rate, plot ratio, the number of bedrooms, supermarkets, bus stops, hospitals, schools, and parks, and the distances between the property and the nearby central business district (CBD), district government, WTE plants, and open water bodies. Although much previous literature has focused on single-family homes [32], more attention in this paper is paid to high-rise buildings and multiple dwellings due to the high population density. Furthermore, in order to better reflect family purchasing preferences, rental data are excluded.…”
Section: Sales Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach used in the hedonic literature to correct this potential bias is to include local fixed effects (Hoen et al, 2009(Hoen et al, , 2011Zabel and Guignet, 2012), which is our approach as described in formula (1).…”
Section: Spatial Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control for both of these issues simultaneously, we use a difference-in-difference (DD) specification (see e.g., Hinman, 2010;Zabel and Guignet, 2012) derived from the interaction of 9 The dataset does not include "participating" landowners, those that have turbines situated on their land, but does include "neighboring" landowners, those adjacent to or nearby the turbines. One reviewer notes that the estimated average effects also include any effects from payments "neighboring" landowners might receive that might transfer with the home.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sales can be compared to one another, taking into account the effects of time (i.e., inflation/deflation), to determine the value of any specific attribute (Butler, 1982;Clapp and Giaccotto, 1998;Jackson, 2001;Simons and Saginor, 2006;Jauregui and Hite, 2010;Kuminoff et al, 2010;Zabel and Guignet, 2012).…”
Section: Methods To Quantify Whether Wind Turbines Are a Disamenitymentioning
confidence: 99%