1994
DOI: 10.1006/aima.1994.1057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hecke Algebra of (Z/rZ)Sn and Construction of Its Irreducible Representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
583
0
8

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(596 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
583
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Proposition 5.5 To see that μ satisfies exactly one of the four conditions, let l denote the lowest node in column j which is not a node of μ, and consider whether SE(l) and SW(l) lie in μ; for the purposes of this argument we regard all nodes of the form (a, 0) or (0, b) as lying in μ. If both SE(l) and SW(l) lie in μ, then l is an addable node and we are in case (1). If neither lies in μ, then S(l) is a removable node, and we are in case (2).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 52mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof of Proposition 5.5 To see that μ satisfies exactly one of the four conditions, let l denote the lowest node in column j which is not a node of μ, and consider whether SE(l) and SW(l) lie in μ; for the purposes of this argument we regard all nodes of the form (a, 0) or (0, b) as lying in μ. If both SE(l) and SW(l) lie in μ, then l is an addable node and we are in case (1). If neither lies in μ, then S(l) is a removable node, and we are in case (2).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 52mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M ( f,g) has a basis indexed by the set of minimal left coset representatives of S f ×S g in S k ; this set is in one-to-one correspondence with the set P f,g of partitions λ for which λ 1 f and λ 1 g; given λ ∈ P f,g , we write the corresponding basis element as t λ m, where…”
Section: Lemma 51 For 1 I K − 2 the Element S I S I+1 S I − S I = Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case there is effectively no ordinary Weyl group and no dominant region; that is to say, the placement of all hyperplanes is controlled by parameters of the algebra. Thus the weight space for the blob algebra, just as for sl 2 , is the Euclidean space associated to the A 1 Coxeter system -that is, it is effectively R (see [57,Section 6]). Now, however, (compare sl 2 ) all integral weights are dominant; that is to say, simple modules may be indexed by Z.…”
Section: Alcove Geometry and Decomposition Numbers For B Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is customary to study them through certain families of quotient algebras, among which the usual choice is the cyclotomic Hecke algebras [2,10]. These quotients, though finite-dimensional, are still complicated, and complete knowledge of their representation theory remains a significant challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%