2010 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics 2010
DOI: 10.1109/bmei.2010.5639619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heart failure diagnosis model based on support vector machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al [24] proposed a classifier based on support-vector machine, which achieved an accuracy of 74% (tenfold cross-validation estimate) in discriminating between mild CHF (NYHA I) and moderate/severe CHF patients (NYHA II and III). We underline that the classifier proposed by Guidi [23] was based on anamnestic and instrumental data (not including HRV measures), and the one by Yang et al [24] was based on 12 parameters, including LF/HF and other parameters from clinical tests (blood test, echocardiography test, electrocardiography test, chest radiography test, and 6-min walk distance test). For that reason, some parameters needed by the automatic classifier proposed by Guidi [23] or Yang et al [24] should be entered by physicians, while the adoption of only HRV measures, as in the current study, enables a completely automatic assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang et al [24] proposed a classifier based on support-vector machine, which achieved an accuracy of 74% (tenfold cross-validation estimate) in discriminating between mild CHF (NYHA I) and moderate/severe CHF patients (NYHA II and III). We underline that the classifier proposed by Guidi [23] was based on anamnestic and instrumental data (not including HRV measures), and the one by Yang et al [24] was based on 12 parameters, including LF/HF and other parameters from clinical tests (blood test, echocardiography test, electrocardiography test, chest radiography test, and 6-min walk distance test). For that reason, some parameters needed by the automatic classifier proposed by Guidi [23] or Yang et al [24] should be entered by physicians, while the adoption of only HRV measures, as in the current study, enables a completely automatic assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, these classifiers are not based on HRV features, except for those proposed by Yang et al [24] who included HRV features but did not provide details about the related processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of their HF diagnosis was 74.44% overall, which was a significant increase over earlier studies which they matched their findings. Accuracy reaches 87.5%, especially in the HF-prone group, which suggests that the suggested methodology is workable for HF early detection ( 40 ). Although the AHF classification performance was partially good in most of these studies, XAI was not examined with model calibration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, El Omary et al [8] employed serveral CNNs for the purpose of detecting cardiac arrhythmia based on electrocardiogram (ECG) two-dimensional (2D) images; in addition, they [9] utilized a variety of pre-trained CNN models to diagnose heart failure in Radiograph images. Next, Yang et al [10] introduced a model aiming at early heart failure diagnosis using a combination of Bayesian principal component analysis (BPCA) and support vector machine (SVM) resulting in an accuracy rate of 74.4%. Afterwards, Miao et al [11] employed DL to devise a system that enhances he dependability and efficiency of CVDs diagnosis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%