A Head-to-Head Comparison of the First-Line Treatments for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Has Chemotherapy Still a Role?

Abstract

Background: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer have been conventionally treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, numerous new treatments have been proposed to improve overall survival (OS) and reduce adverse effects, but no head-to-head direct comparison is available. Methods: We considered: a) monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI); b) combinations of an ICI with chemotherapy; c) combinations of an ICI with other drugs. An indirect comparison was performed to identify the regimens most effective in prolonging OS compared to each other and to chemotherapy. Results: A total of 6 articles were included. In our final analysis, nivolumab plus chemotherapy showed better OS compared to chemotherapy (HR= 0.70, 95%CI: .59-0.82); while durvalumab plus tremelimumab showed no OS benefit (HR=0.95, 95%CI 0.82-1.11). More interestingly, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab significantly prolonged OS compared to both chemotherapy alone (HR=0.53, 95%CI 0.45-0.63) and nivolumab plus chemotherapy (HR= 0.76, 95%CI 0.60-0.97). Discussion and conclusion: Among new treatments for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer, enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab showed the best efficacy in terms of OS. Our results support the use of this combination as first-line treatment in this setting.