2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A head-to-head comparison between 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic and conventional coronary angiographies in measurement of myocardial bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By analyzing their references, we found another 16 potentially relevant articles that were also downloaded. From the 203 articles, 120 were included in the final analysis of prevalence. Details about search synthesis are presented in Figure S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing their references, we found another 16 potentially relevant articles that were also downloaded. From the 203 articles, 120 were included in the final analysis of prevalence. Details about search synthesis are presented in Figure S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The within-MB diameters on MDCT-CTA and coronary angiography showed a significant correlation during systolic and diastolic phases. In case of MB, segments with sufficient systolic compression (>50%), length of MBs on MDCT and coronary angiography correlated significantly not only at systolic phase but also at diastolic phase [63]. Kim et al in a study with 300 patients who received 64 section MDCT showed that frequency of MB was 58% which partial encasement of 57 patients and full encasement of 117 paxents, while only 40 patients (13.3%; partial encasement in 1 patient and full encasement in 39) demonstrated dynamic compression at conventional angiography.…”
Section: Comparison Of Coronary Ct Angiography and Invasive Coronary mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In present study, the incidence was shown as 14.1%, which was similar to the prevalence of 16.1% in a large Chinese cohort undergoing coronary angiography (26). A variety of factors, such as the length and thickness of MB, anatomic relationship of MB and MCA, percentage of connective tissue and fat tissue around MCA, the using of vessel dilator, the angle of view and the experience of the viewers, may contribute to the discrepancy of the prevalence of MB from study to study (14,(27)(28)(29). In this study, we paid much attention to detect MB-MCAs while performing angiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%