2012
DOI: 10.1177/0959651811432669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hardware–software system for coordinated multi-axis control based on a non uniform rational B-splines interpolator applied to industrial computer numerically controlled machines

Abstract: Motion controllers are widely used in many mechatronic applications such as computer numerically controlled machine tools and robots. These applications demand the use of high performance controllers. Some desirable characteristics in motion controllers are coordinated multi-axis control, smooth movements, and advanced interpolation methods. An important manufacturing aspect involves the production of a workpiece in a free form or using the parametric surfaces in modern computer aided design/computer aided man… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the power basis functions, C ( u ) , C ( u ) , and C ( u ) can be quickly computed, and their latencies are 117, 93, and 69, respectively. However, with the DeBoor-Cox algorithm, 4 the latencies of calculating C ( u ) , C ( u ) , and C ( u ) are 456, 288, and 233, respectively. Compared with the DeBoor-Cox algorithm, the latencies of the proposed curve conversion algorithm can be reduced by about 71.1% on average (as seen in Table 4).…”
Section: Theoretical Computational Efficiency Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the power basis functions, C ( u ) , C ( u ) , and C ( u ) can be quickly computed, and their latencies are 117, 93, and 69, respectively. However, with the DeBoor-Cox algorithm, 4 the latencies of calculating C ( u ) , C ( u ) , and C ( u ) are 456, 288, and 233, respectively. Compared with the DeBoor-Cox algorithm, the latencies of the proposed curve conversion algorithm can be reduced by about 71.1% on average (as seen in Table 4).…”
Section: Theoretical Computational Efficiency Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed algorithm (latency) 117 93 69 DeBoor-Cox algorithm 4 (latency) 456 288 233 length calculation. Then, the look-ahead ACC/DEC module obtains the velocity profiles.…”
Section: Platform Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, there are several DSP developments for parametric interpolators and CNC controllers, being B-splines (Erkorkmaz & Altintas, 2001) and NURBS interpolators (Cheng & Tsai, 2004;Tsai, Cheng, & Cheng, 2003) the main reported techniques. In addition, FPGA developments of hardware/software architectures for tool path computation have been proposed for spline (De Santiago-Perez, Osornio-Rios, Romero-Troncoso, Cabal-Yepez, & Guevara-Gonzalez, 2010) and NURBS (Cuenca, Martinez, Jimeno, & Sanchez, 2007;Jaen-Cuellar et al, 2012;Yau, Lin, & Tsai, 2006). Yet, these FPGA developments present the implementation of trajectory interpolation for a single interpolation technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…26 Particularly in the field of multi-axis systems, such as robot and computer numerical control (CNC) system, the HW/SW solution is a more appropriate choice. 7 The HW/SW system can be classified into SoC-based system and processors and programmable logic (PL) device system. Compared with the SoC-based system, the latter has the features of good flexibility and portability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%