2011 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/biocas.2011.6107718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hardware implementation of real-time epileptic seizure detector on FPGA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In neural recording, the artifact-induced problem of stimulation sometimes emerges and affects the function of biomedical devices for brain stimulation and recording (Asfour et al, 2007;Chen et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2013;Caldwell et al, 2019). As shown in Figure 1B, in the closed-loop neural recording and stimulation circuit for epileptic seizure detection and suppression, the stimulator is triggered, and it generates stimulation pulses in certain regions of the brain to suppress the epileptic seizure when an epileptic seizure episode is detected from the intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG).…”
Section: Neural Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In neural recording, the artifact-induced problem of stimulation sometimes emerges and affects the function of biomedical devices for brain stimulation and recording (Asfour et al, 2007;Chen et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2013;Caldwell et al, 2019). As shown in Figure 1B, in the closed-loop neural recording and stimulation circuit for epileptic seizure detection and suppression, the stimulator is triggered, and it generates stimulation pulses in certain regions of the brain to suppress the epileptic seizure when an epileptic seizure episode is detected from the intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG).…”
Section: Neural Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, all existing hardware implementations tasked for epileptic seizure detection and prediction have been realized using Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), CMOS and Very-large-scale Integration (VLSI) technologies. Most existing hardware implementations detect epileptic seizures using traditional Machine Learning (ML) algorithms such as Linear Least Squares (LLS) [7], Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [8], and k-nearest neighbors (kNN) [9]. We refer the reader to [10] for a comprehensive survey of epileptic seizure detection and prediction systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing BCIs [16,17,23,27,28] are designed for singlesite implantation and lack the ability to store adequately long historical neural data. Most BCIs [29,30] have additional limitations in that they have historically eschewed a subset of programmability, data rates, and flexibility to meet safe power constraints. These BCIs are specialized to a specific task and/or limit personalization of the algorithm [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most BCIs [29,30] have additional limitations in that they have historically eschewed a subset of programmability, data rates, and flexibility to meet safe power constraints. These BCIs are specialized to a specific task and/or limit personalization of the algorithm [29,30]. Some support more programmability by sacrificing high data rates [16,17,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%