2021 IEEE Madrid PowerTech 2021
DOI: 10.1109/powertech46648.2021.9494789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hardware Implementation of an Online Frequency Dynamic Parameter Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the total inertia of the system was determined by an inertia estimation algorithm that captures generation contingency events from the PMU stream data. The data was captured using the laboratory hardware and software described in [24]. This algorithm considers the slope of the actual frequency events, as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Recorded Data For Load Inertia Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the total inertia of the system was determined by an inertia estimation algorithm that captures generation contingency events from the PMU stream data. The data was captured using the laboratory hardware and software described in [24]. This algorithm considers the slope of the actual frequency events, as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Recorded Data For Load Inertia Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of the algorithm is to identify the parameters of the model depicted in Figure 1 to identify actual data that is captured with the hardware described above. More explanatory details on the algorithm are found in [33,34]. The general structure of the identification algorithm is shown in Figure 5, and it was built by using Python and Matlab.…”
Section: Data Analytics Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have investigated the possible challenges when measuring the RoCoF since its behaviour might determine a possible loss of stability or poorly control performance. A study showing the impact of the RoCoF location measurements is shown in [16], the susceptibility of RoCoF measurements to common power system disturbances such as phase steps is described in [17], the settings of RoCoF relays during islanding are studied in [18], an on-line frequency estimator is proposed in [19], and implementing a digital filter and consecutive data-points for inertia estimation and a comparison of frequency estimation techniques are explored in [20]. A study of several variations of PLL for PMU application is presented in [21], investigating the update rate of frequency and RoCoF measurements with high accuracy under off-nominal frequency scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%