2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems

Abstract: BackgroundImplementing new practices requires changes in the behaviour of relevant actors, and this is facilitated by understanding of the determinants of current and desired behaviours. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed by a collaboration of behavioural scientists and implementation researchers who identified theories relevant to implementation and grouped constructs from these theories into domains. The collaboration aimed to provide a comprehensive, theory-informed approach to identify d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
2,755
0
22

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,120 publications
(2,970 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
20
2,755
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…These same eligible therapists were then invited to participate in a focus group (60 minutes in duration, both disciplines in attendance) to further explore their motivators and barriers to implementing upper limb guideline recommendations that had been highlighted in survey results. The semi‐structured interview guide for the focus groups was developed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (Cane, O’Connor, & Michie, ; Michie et al , ) using the recommendations published by Atkins et al () (Data S1). Survey results were used to inform focus group prompt and probing questions (see data analysis for more details) and included questions such as ‘ what do you think about the evidence base behind upper limb rehabilitation’ and ‘ what are some of the things that stop you applying upper limb clinical practice guideline recommendations’?.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These same eligible therapists were then invited to participate in a focus group (60 minutes in duration, both disciplines in attendance) to further explore their motivators and barriers to implementing upper limb guideline recommendations that had been highlighted in survey results. The semi‐structured interview guide for the focus groups was developed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (Cane, O’Connor, & Michie, ; Michie et al , ) using the recommendations published by Atkins et al () (Data S1). Survey results were used to inform focus group prompt and probing questions (see data analysis for more details) and included questions such as ‘ what do you think about the evidence base behind upper limb rehabilitation’ and ‘ what are some of the things that stop you applying upper limb clinical practice guideline recommendations’?.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include environmental context and resources, knowledge, skills, intentions, goals and behavioural regulations (Table ). TDF has been used extensively in qualitative studies to identify target behaviours for future interventions and to characterise implementation problems (Atkins et al, ; Cane et al, ). The researchers have previously used TDF in qualitative studies in identifying barriers of: access to primary healthcare by persons experiencing homeless (Gunner et al, ) and effective transition of care of such persons across services (Smith, Paudyal, MacLure, et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) identifies influences on individual health professional behaviors related to the implementation of evidence‐based recommendations. The TDF has been applied across a wide range of healthcare settings and clinical behaviors . It is a synthesis of behavior change theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%