2013
DOI: 10.4324/9781315807232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Guide to SPSS for Analysis of Variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance, and posthoc testing was performed for intergroup comparisons using the least significant difference (LSD) (Levine, 1991). A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance, and posthoc testing was performed for intergroup comparisons using the least significant difference (LSD) (Levine, 1991). A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrophysiological results were evaluated with mixed-model ANOVAs, with between-subjects factor of analytic group (uninjured control, TBI + BEC [untreated], and TBI + BEC [GM6001-treated]). Repeated measures factor was time relative to application of theta-burst stimulation (for LTP analyses), or inter-pulse interval (for PPF analyses), with planned pair-wise comparisons computed based on simple effects (Keppel, 1991;Levine, 1991). For LTP baseline and post-HFS data, mean fEPSP slopes were aggregated into 2-min epochs used for graphical and statistical analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of N groups to be compared, the number of comparisons is N × ( N − 1)/2. For example, in the case of 50 journals, 50×49/2 = 1,225 comparisons are pursued, and the significance should hence be tested at the 5% level using 0.05/1,225=0.000041 instead of 0.05 (Levine, 1991, pp. 68 ff.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%