2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3276(10)59010-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Guide to QM/MM Methodology and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 268 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest way would be to randomly break chains, cap the ends with carboxylate groups, and then evaluate how this influences water distribution within the polymer. More complex approaches would be to use either a bond-breaking molecular mechanics (MM) potential, or to conduct combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations, 53 with the QM part focusing on the areas of the polymer where water is predicted by the TIGER2 simulations to be clustered. This could then involve iterative simulations of QM/MM followed by further simulations using TIGER2/TIGER3 to re-equilibrate the water within the polymer after the hydrolysis steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest way would be to randomly break chains, cap the ends with carboxylate groups, and then evaluate how this influences water distribution within the polymer. More complex approaches would be to use either a bond-breaking molecular mechanics (MM) potential, or to conduct combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations, 53 with the QM part focusing on the areas of the polymer where water is predicted by the TIGER2 simulations to be clustered. This could then involve iterative simulations of QM/MM followed by further simulations using TIGER2/TIGER3 to re-equilibrate the water within the polymer after the hydrolysis steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the first item, three approaches have been widely used to treat the electrostatic interactions between QM and MM parts: (i) electrostatic, (ii) mechanical, and (iii) polarizable embedding. The electrostatic embedding approach enables the polarization of the QM part since the charge distribution of the MM part is incorporated in the QM calculation . Contrary to the electrostatic embedding approach, in mechanical embedding, the QM atoms are represented as point charges, bond dipoles, or higher multipoles.…”
Section: Models and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEP/MD simulations were carried out via the PERT module of the program CHARMM (Brooks et al, 2009) using Langevin dynamics. The computations with the Drude polarizable force field were carried out using the same procedure with the ion parameters of Yu et al (2010c).bDFT FEP calculations were performed at the PBE/DZVP level of theory (Perdew et al, 1996) using the CHARMM/DeMon2k interface (Lev et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2010). The DFT relative free energy difference for the ions in bulk was calculated using 16 water molecules restrained within a spherical volume around the ion, mimicking the bulk density.…”
Section: Force Field Induced Polarization and Quantum Mechanics (Qm)mentioning
confidence: 99%