A Guide to Paradigmatic Self-Marginalization: Lessons for Post-Keynesian Economists

Dobusch, Leonhard; Kapeller, Jakob

doi:10.1080/09538259.2012.701928

Cited by 33 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Figure also depicts a low connection among the four coloured nodes. The Journals within each coloured node can be described as a core-periphery pattern (Dobusch and Kapeller 2012 ). The core journals are shown in the central spot within each node, which are considered the primary academic Journals of a particular thematic area of the IB&F research.…”

Section: Network Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric network analysis of thirty years of islamic banking and finance scholarly research

Hassanein

Mostafa

2022

Qual Quant

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study utilizes bibliometric analyses to map and visualize the development, conceptual structure, and thematic evolution of the Islamic Banking and Finance (IB&F) scholarly research. It analyses 464 WoS IB&F research publications of 921 authors comprising 58 countries published over three decades from 1990 to 2019. The results reveal that (i) collaboration among countries is limited and institutional collaboration can be described as a “locally concentrated and globally isolated,“ (ii) the IB&F research is a type of “small-world-network” where few authors and journals dominate the networks and play a central role in the diffusion of knowledge and the “homophily impact” is present among the leading authors of the IB&F research, (iii) the networks in IB&F research reflects the “Matthew Effect,“ implying that few authors have a more significant number of networks compared to the rest of authors. The study has also identified the conceptual structure and thematic trends in the IB&F research and provides avenues for future research.

show abstract

Section: Network Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric network analysis of thirty years of islamic banking and finance scholarly research

Hassanein

Mostafa

2022

Qual Quant

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, we explore four ways of theorizing about MGP’s voices as a criticism of being marginalized in business, a criticism most clearly expressed in quotations: (i) We apply Amartya Sen’s perspective on MGP’s critical agency to contribute to a more positive publishing policy in the JBE and BEQ , in cooperation with MGP, a plan focusing on MGP’s explicit voices about their experiences of being marginalized in business; (ii) we present a criticism of the gatekeeping role of academia linked to a possible exclusion of the quotations of MGP’s critical agency; (iii) we denote quotations of MGP’s criticism of their marginalized role in business assigned the role of a primary source; and (iv) we introduce a participative perspective on MGP’s criticism of the lived experience, particularity, and complexity of being marginalized in business. We consider these heterodox positions as characterized by what Dobusch and Kapeller ( 2012 ) call “the epistemological advantage associated with a pluralist conception of science” (p. 485).…”

Section: Discussion Of Theoretical Possibilities: Normative Epistemologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Enabling the Voices of Marginalized Groups of People in Theoretical Business Ethics Research

Alm

Guttormsen

2021

J Bus Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper addresses an understudied but highly relevant group of people within corporate organizations and society in general—the marginalized—as well as their narration, and criticism, of personal lived experiences of marginalization in business. They are conventionally perceived to lack traditional forms of power such as public influence, formal authority, education, money, and political positions; however, they still possess the resources to impact their situations, their circumstances, and the structures that determine their situations. Business ethics researchers seldom consider marginalized people’s voices and experiences as resources to understand their lives, as demonstrated through a review of 7500 articles published in the Journal of Business Ethics and Business Ethics Quarterly (2000–2019). Only 78 studies included aspects of marginalized groups. 69 of those studies discussed the topic of marginalized groups of people, but without integrating their explicit voices into the text. Only 9 of the 78 articles featured marginalized people’s explicit voices about their marginalization experiences incorporated into the text as a source for exploration. None of the identified studies discussed the potential for theorizing based on such voices. This paper contributes to business ethics theory by developing four theoretical possibilities vis-à-vis the critical voices of marginalized people’s experiences in business: (a) marginalized theory on critical agency and freedom of speech; (b) the gatekeeping role of academia; (c) primary sources; and (d) a participative perspective. Discussing the theoretical potential of quoting the above voices can enrich business ethics research in terms of the theoretical understanding of marginalized groups in business.

show abstract

“…The resulting lack of diversity within the economic discipline has been studied empirically, in particular by analyzing the relative citation flows between 13 high-ranked mainstream and 13 high-ranked heterodox economic journals in two different periods: before -2008Dobusch & Kapeller 2012b) and after the recent financial and economic crisis (2009Aistleitner et al 2018). The results indicate that the monistic and closed citation behavior exhibited by (highly-ranked) mainstream economic journals remained stable after the crisis, as the mainstream journals continue to devote only minimal attention to heterodox inputs (as is evidenced by the small share of citations -less than 3% -imported from heterodox sources 13 ; see Figure 9).…”

Section: Diversitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Citation Patterns in Economics and Beyond

2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we comparatively explore three claims concerning the disciplinary character of economics by means of citation analysis. The three claims under study are: (1) economics exhibits strong forms of institutional stratification and, as a byproduct, a rather pronounced internal hierarchy, (2) economists strongly conform to institutional incentives and (3) modern mainstream economics is a largely selfreferential intellectual project mostly inaccessible to disciplinary or paradigmatic outsiders. The validity of these claims is assessed by means of an interdisciplinary comparison of citation patterns aiming to identify peculiar characteristics of economic discourse. In doing so, we emphasize that citation data can always be interpreted in different ways, thereby focusing on the contrast between a 'cognitive' and an 'evaluative' approach towards citation data.

show abstract

A Guide to Paradigmatic Self-Marginalization: Lessons for Post-Keynesian Economists

Cited by 33 publications

References 21 publications

Bibliometric network analysis of thirty years of islamic banking and finance scholarly research

Bibliometric network analysis of thirty years of islamic banking and finance scholarly research

Enabling the Voices of Marginalized Groups of People in Theoretical Business Ethics Research

Citation Patterns in Economics and Beyond

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About