2016
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Guide to Historical Data Sets for Reconstructing Ecosystem Service Change over Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we build on the well-known links between LULC and ES supply (Balthazar et al 2015;Bürgi et al 2015b) to address a major knowledge gap concerning the development of cross-border ES assessments over long timeframes (Dallimer et al 2015;Renard et al 2015;Tomscha et al 2016). We combined the key findings of two scientific studies to advance the understanding of ES interactions under long-term LULC change (Tomscha and Gergel 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, we build on the well-known links between LULC and ES supply (Balthazar et al 2015;Bürgi et al 2015b) to address a major knowledge gap concerning the development of cross-border ES assessments over long timeframes (Dallimer et al 2015;Renard et al 2015;Tomscha et al 2016). We combined the key findings of two scientific studies to advance the understanding of ES interactions under long-term LULC change (Tomscha and Gergel 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combined the key findings of two scientific studies to advance the understanding of ES interactions under long-term LULC change (Tomscha and Gergel 2016). The first study, by Egarter Vigl et al (2016), used a historical approach to derive the pattern of multiple ES for a set of representative case studies in the Alps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this was outside for the scope of the current study. Focusing on colonial records only, researchers are increasingly aware of the potential biases in the type of user that is represented in such analyses [23], though it is interesting to note that recent highprofile conceptual frameworks that have been posited to study historical ecosystem services have highlighted the importance of personal perspectives in assessing historical ecosystem services, but still do not adequately take such biases into account [22]. It is important to note the type of author that wrote these articles, and the audiences that these articles were intended to reach, as this has implications for the perception and interpretation of historical ecosystem services.…”
Section: Sources Of Historical Information On Mangrove Ecosystem Servmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on ecosystem disservices may be particularly skewed as some of the writers may have been less familiar with the mangrove setting. To address this, it would be suitable to consult alternative sources of information created by local mangrove users during this time period, including local records and oral histories [22]. However, this was outside for the scope of the current study.…”
Section: Sources Of Historical Information On Mangrove Ecosystem Servmentioning
confidence: 99%