2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A guide to group effective connectivity analysis, part 1: First level analysis with DCM for fMRI

Abstract: Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) is the predominant method for inferring effective connectivity from neuroimaging data. In the 15 years since its introduction, the neural models and statistical routines in DCM have developed in parallel, driven by the needs of researchers in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. In this guide, we step through an exemplar fMRI analysis in detail, reviewing the current implementation of DCM and demonstrating recent developments in group-level connectivity analysis. In the appendice… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
310
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
310
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike previous studies, we did not find a modulation of backward connections, which may be due to a number of reasons. First, we have taken advantage of the recently developed parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) approach (Friston et al, 2016;Zeidman et al, 2019) , which allows more precise inferences at the single parameter level, informed by empirical priors taken from group-level estimates, as compared to classical random-fixed effect modelling. Second, the stimulation used in past studies is inherently different from ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, unlike previous studies, we did not find a modulation of backward connections, which may be due to a number of reasons. First, we have taken advantage of the recently developed parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) approach (Friston et al, 2016;Zeidman et al, 2019) , which allows more precise inferences at the single parameter level, informed by empirical priors taken from group-level estimates, as compared to classical random-fixed effect modelling. Second, the stimulation used in past studies is inherently different from ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then used parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) (Friston et al, 2016;Zeidman et al, 2019) had been re-evaluated using the group means as priors to obtain the most robust estimates (Zeidman et al, 2019) . An advantage of PEB, as opposed to classical random-effects (RFX) analysis, is that PEB takes not only the mean, but also the uncertainty of individual connection strengths into account.…”
Section: Parametric Empirical Bayesian (Peb) Analysis Of Group Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPE parametric modulators were used as modulating inputs on the recursive connections between Area 9 and VS. DCMs were fitted to the data for observation and control conditions in both groups. To account for between-subject variability, DCMs were then subjected to a 3-level hierarchical analysis based on Parametric Empirical Bayes (PEB; Zeidman et al, 2019a, 2019b, Friston et al, 2016). The first level comprised a total of 8 DCM parameters (4 for the baseline connections (A-matrix) and 4 for the modulatory connections (B-matrix)) for every subject and observation condition which were subjected to PEB on the second and third levels, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCM was implemented using the Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM12; Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK) to estimate the EC between the regions of interest (ROIs; Zeidman et al, 2019). Based on the group results from a previous study (Esménio et al, 2019), we selected the brain regions associated with high-level social processing (Bzdok et al, 2012;Schurz et al, 2014;Alcalá-López et al, 2018); namely, those regions activated during both self and other condition.…”
Section: Effective Connectivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%