2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40435-018-0500-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A guaranteed-comfort and safe adaptive cruise control by considering driver’s acceptance level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The adaptive following model is designed to simulate the driver’s following process. The driver’s decisions are often after sensing external information, and the brain’s judgment is expressed as the control of the vehicle 22 . Therefore, this study discusses the driver’s following behavior from the perspective of vehicle control and the vehicle’s motion state and verifies the functioning of the constructed adaptive longitudinal following model that integrates the sensing process and driving characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adaptive following model is designed to simulate the driver’s following process. The driver’s decisions are often after sensing external information, and the brain’s judgment is expressed as the control of the vehicle 22 . Therefore, this study discusses the driver’s following behavior from the perspective of vehicle control and the vehicle’s motion state and verifies the functioning of the constructed adaptive longitudinal following model that integrates the sensing process and driving characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two standard operating conditions, ECE and FTP75 (U.S. urban cycle operating conditions), were introduced as test conditions 23 to verify the drivers’ longitudinal following behavior for different driver characteristic parameters under the same operating conditions. They were also used to analyze and compare the variability of the adaptive model in processing different driver following data and evaluating and analyzing the reproduced types of driver following behavior according to the evaluation index 22 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, according to some recent research focusing on the driving goals and outcomes perspectives of vehicle speed assistance systems such as [70,71], driver acceptance level or preferences is a factor that needs to be taken into account to improve ITS. As Table 5 illustrates, some research such as [30,45] have concentrated on only one of the driving goals reviewed in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More theoretical and application problems are discussed in (Agrawal, 2007; Athans and Falb, 2013; Bryson and Ho, 2018; MacCluer, 2013; Naidu, 2002). Theory of controllability were used in studying fractional evolution equations such as (Kumar and Kumar, 2017; Kumar and Kumar, 2019), and the application of controllability was used in studying functional differential equations such as (Kumar and Kumar, 2015; Shukla and Patel (2021a)), and other works see (Amer et al, 2022; Bengochea and Ortigueira, 2017; Biswal et al, 2022; Bouazza et al, 2021; Boudjerida and Seba, 2022; Das and Samanta, 2021; Ezzahri et al, 2018; Fiuzy and Shamaghdari, 2022; Mohtavipour et al, 2019; Ibrahim and Hameed, 2021; Singh and Pandey, 2019; Zhang et al, 2022; Lu and Zuazua, 2016). Some researchers have worked on this fractal definition such as (Chen, 2006; Chen, 2006; Chen et al, 2010; Hu et al, 2020; Yang, 2021a; Yang, 2021b; Yang, 2022a et al; Yang, 2019; Yang, 2021c; Yang et al, 2022b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%