A Growing Role for Gender Analysis in Air Pollution Epidemiology

Abstract

ObjectiveEpidemiologic studies of air pollution effects on respiratory health report significant modification by sex, although results are not uniform. Importantly, it remains unclear whether modifications are attributable to socially derived gendered exposures, to sex-linked physiological differences, or to some interplay thereof. Gender analysis, which aims to disaggregate social from biological differences between males and females, may help to elucidate these possible sources of effect modification.Data sources and data extractionA PubMed literature search was performed in July 2009, using the terms “respiratory” and any of “sex” or “gender” or “men and women” or “boys and girls” and either “PM2.5” (particulate matter ≥ 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter) or “NO2” (nitrogen dioxide). I reviewed the identified studies, and others cited therein, to summarize current evidence of effect modification, with attention to authors’ interpretation of observed differences. Owing to broad differences in exposure mixes, outcomes, and analytic techniques, with few studies examining any given combination thereof, meta-analysis was not deemed appropriate at this time.Data synthesisMore studies of adults report stronger effects among women, particularly for older persons or where using residential exposure assessment. Studies of children suggest stronger effects among boys in early life and among girls in later childhood.ConclusionsThe qualitative review describes possible sources of difference in air pollution response between women and men, which may vary by life stage, coexposures, hormonal status, or other factors. The sources of observed effect modifications remain unclear, although gender analytic approaches may help to disentangle gender and sex differences in pollution response. A framework for incorporating gender analysis into environmental epidemiology is offered, along with several potentially useful methods from gender analysis.

Relationship between air pollution and metal levels in cancerous and non-cancerous lung tissues

“…occupational) or to a combination of the two. [22] Our results did not support these hypotheses, since we reported no differences between gender groups of patients studied.…”

The relationship between ambient particulate matter and respiratory mortality: a multi-city study in Italy

“…Further studies will doubtless address the topic of sex-related susceptibility more thoroughly; however, a higher female susceptibility to air pollution has been postulated because of the greater female reactivity to smoking, and has been justified by differences in the effective dose increasing the final effect in females. Sex differences have been reported for airborne gas adsorption and gas-blood barrier permeability, for vascular transport and organ accumulation of toxic chemicals and, finally, for a sex-linked hormonal status, which alters the vascular effects of diesel exhaust [39].…”

Indoor air problems and experiences of injustice in the workplace: A quantitative and a qualitative study

“…The gender distribution may reflect the finding that women are more sensitive to environmental exposures than men. 30 For example, Caress and Steinemann 31 report that women are more prone to suffer from multiple chemical sensitivity than men (72% for women and 28% for men). Thus, further research is needed with other kinds of samples and both qualitative and quantitative methods should be used.…”