2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(04)00543-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Group II Intron-encoded Maturase Functions Preferentially In Cis and Requires Both the Reverse Transcriptase and X Domains to Promote RNA Splicing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binding of LtrA to DIVa is considered to be the first contact of LtrA with the intron and impacts splicing efficiency (28). In addition, this interaction represses translation of the LtrA reading frame (29) and has been suggested to be more important for intron mobility than for splicing (30). We see no strong association of the area surrounding the matK start codon or of any sequences between DIII and DIV with tagged MatK (Fig.…”
Section: Peak Enrichment Of Rna Coprecipitated With Matk Is Found Inmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Binding of LtrA to DIVa is considered to be the first contact of LtrA with the intron and impacts splicing efficiency (28). In addition, this interaction represses translation of the LtrA reading frame (29) and has been suggested to be more important for intron mobility than for splicing (30). We see no strong association of the area surrounding the matK start codon or of any sequences between DIII and DIV with tagged MatK (Fig.…”
Section: Peak Enrichment Of Rna Coprecipitated With Matk Is Found Inmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, if MatK autoregulation is maintained in chloroplasts it is not likely to occur via docking to the translational start of MatK. Possibly, loss of binding in this area was tolerable, because the DIVa-maturase interaction was more important for intron mobility than for splicing (30), a feature definitely lost in chloroplasts.…”
Section: Peak Enrichment Of Rna Coprecipitated With Matk Is Found Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ll.LtrB IEP, denoted LtrA protein, has four domains: RT, which contains the conserved RT sequence blocks and corresponds to fingers and palm regions of retroviral RTs; X, which corresponds to the RT thumb and is a site of mutations affecting RNA splicing activity; D, DNA binding; and En, DNA endonuclease (Cui et al 2004;Blocker et al 2005). The RT and X domains bind the intron RNA to stabilize its active structure for RNA splicing and reverse splicing, while the D and En domains are not required for RNA splicing but instead interact with DNA target sites during intron mobility (San Filippo and Lambowitz 2002;Cui et al 2004;Blocker et al 2005). LtrA appears to be largely monomeric in solution, but binds to the intron RNA with a stoichiometry of 2:1, suggesting that it functions as a dimer, similar to HIV-1 and some other RTs (Saldanha et al 1999;Rambo and Doudna 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DIVa is thought to contribute to the intron specificity of binding, but if DIVa is deleted, LtrA can still promote RNA splicing at reduced efficiency by binding directly to the catalytic core Matsuura et al 2001). Notably, LtrA functions preferentially in cis to promote the splicing of the intron that encodes it (Cui et al 2004), and the binding of LtrA to DIVa down-regulates its own translation (Singh et al 2002). Although not always a site of translation initiation, a predicted DIVa stem-loop structure is present in most group II introns that encode IEPs, and the yeast aI2 IEP has also been shown to bind both DIVa and catalytic core regions, suggesting that this mode of interaction is conserved among group II IEPs (Singh et al 2002;Huang et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation