2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ground-based observation of the LCROSS impact events using the Subaru Telescope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from an enhancement of sodium in the lunar exosphere after the impact 10 , no other positive ground-based detections of the LCROSS debris plume were reported. Two groups reported non-detections from ground-based observations 11,12 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from an enhancement of sodium in the lunar exosphere after the impact 10 , no other positive ground-based detections of the LCROSS debris plume were reported. Two groups reported non-detections from ground-based observations 11,12 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these Earth-based data, Killen et al [10] detected the temporal spectral signature of sodium in the lunar exosphere, and no one reported a detection of the dust plume using standard image processing techniques [8]. Two observational campaigns presented detailed analyses of their imaging non-detections [11,12]. In their time series V-band imaging, Chanover et al [11] found that their non-detection implied a limiting plume surface brightness of 189 times fainter than the brightest illuminated surface in a foreground ridge adjacent to Cabeus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) passed by the impact site between the times of the Centaur and SSC impacts [ Gladstone et al , 2010]. Ground based observatories watched the event [e.g., Killen et al , 2010; Hong et al , 2011; Miller et al , 2009; Heldmann et al , 2011]. Thus, data were taken from multiple perspectives to determine the composition and quantities of materials in the ejecta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%