A “greenhouse gas balance” for aviation in line with the Paris Agreement

Abstract

The effects of aviation on climate pose unique policy challenges. A large fraction of the CO2 emissions (65%) is international and not (explicitly) included in the Paris Agreement. The interpretation of Article 4.1 on achieving a “balance between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases” is ambiguous in the context of aviation because of the substantial non‐CO2 effects associated with the sector. For the achievement of the temperature goal in Article 2, both CO2 and non‐CO2 effects are important. The non‐CO2 effects contribute 66% of the sectoral total climate effect (in terms of Effective Radiative Forcing; ERF) at present, with significant uncertainties. The largest of these non‐CO2 effects, contrail‐cirrus and the net‐effect of NOx, are not caused by direct greenhouse gas emissions, representing another ambiguity as to whether they should be included in the balance concept. We discuss the role of aviation in the context of the Paris Agreement, and present illustrative calculations of a hypothetical aviation “greenhouse gas balance.” Several questions are addressed: Which components should be included? If an aggregate of components is adopted for the “balance,” which metric should be used? How can the large differences in timescales as well as the large intrinsic underlying ERF uncertainties be handled? We demonstrate that these choices result in very different requirements for CO2‐removal from the atmosphere and different temperature outcomes over time. The article provides policymakers with an overview of issues and choices that are important regarding which approach is most appropriate for defining and achieving a greenhouse gas balance for aviation in the context of the Paris Agreement.This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > International Policy Framework Climate and Development > Knowledge and Action in Development Paleoclimates and Current Trends > Climate Forcing

Uncertainties in mitigating aviation non-CO2 emissions for climate and air quality using hydrocarbon fuels

“…32 How 'net zero' relates to aviation is also complicated by its non-CO 2 emissions, and the fact that international aviation emissions are not explicitly identied in the agreement and fall outside of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), whereas the Kyoto Protocol gave specic responsibility for international aviation emissions to ICAO. 24 4 Combustion, emissions, and fuels…”

Domestic and international aviation emission inventories for the UNFCCC parties

“…The International Civil Aviation organization (ICAO) serves as a United Nations entity responsible for international coordination in the sector. However, its existing climate strategy has drawn critique for perceived insufficiency in ambition and means to meet the Paris Agreement's goal , Lyle 2018, Pathak et al 2022, Fuglestvedt et al 2023. Hence, national efforts formulated in the NDCs could play an important role in mitigating aviation emissions.…”

Feasibility of contrail avoidance in a commercial flight planning system: an operational analysis

“…The environmental impact of commercial aviation has gained significant attention as a prominent industry challenge. While studies of aviation's climate impacts have primarily focused only on carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, recent research has highlighted the importance of non-CO 2 emissions, particularly nitrogen oxides (NOx), water vapor, and aerosols (soot and sulfates) [1][2][3]. In certain atmospheric conditions, exhaust heat, water vapor, and aerosols mix with the background atmosphere to form condensation trails (contrails) [4].…”