2018
DOI: 10.1109/cc.2018.8424605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A greedy traffic light and queue aware routing protocol for urban VANETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greedy Traffic Light and Queue aware Routing (GTLQR) [24] proposed based on street connectivity, channel quality, queuing delay and distance metrics. This protocol alleviates the packet loss by adopting clustering strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Greedy Traffic Light and Queue aware Routing (GTLQR) [24] proposed based on street connectivity, channel quality, queuing delay and distance metrics. This protocol alleviates the packet loss by adopting clustering strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cluster-based routing utilizes less bandwidth and more scalable to improve network data routing. However, if we compared the cluster-based routing protocols so still some have more overhead and complex processes such as CBRSDN [8], PassCAR [20] and GTLQR [24]. On the other hand, some are designed for highway scenarios and not feasible for urban areas such as SBCA [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are computed for each vehicle at the time of the route discovery phase to transmit data from source to destination, and hence it takes a longer time to discover the route and hence leads to higher communication delay and data loss. Another congestion-aware routing method is designed for urban areas called GTLQR (greedy traffic light & queueaware routing) in [23]. In GTLQR, they used the parameters such as channel quality, queuing delay, street connectivity, and relative distance to reduce the congestion and hence data loss in VANET.…”
Section: A Congestion Detection and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties like high message rates, unreliable channel quality, and severe mobility lead to a significant problem for VANETs routing. The congestion control protocols [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] were designed to make sure the reliable transmission of security messages in V2V communications. However, adaptive congestion prediction and its utilization during the route discovery are missing in all works.…”
Section: B Research Motivation and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also define problems in the following works. A greedy traffic light and queue-aware routing protocol were introduced in urban VANETs [41]. Packet drop is high in transmission since all vehicle selects high connectivity street to discover the path, which increases queue size of the vehicles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%