2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10878-014-9720-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A greedy algorithm for the minimum $$2$$ 2 -connected $$m$$ m -fold dominating set problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…general (2, m) 4 + ln(δ + m − 2) + 2 ln(2 + ln(δ + m − 2)) [24] UDG (2, 1) 72 [29] UDG ( As a consequence, we have the following result. …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…general (2, m) 4 + ln(δ + m − 2) + 2 ln(2 + ln(δ + m − 2)) [24] UDG (2, 1) 72 [29] UDG ( As a consequence, we have the following result. …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In a recent paper, we [24] proposed a ln(δ + m − 2) + o(ln δ) -approximation algorithm for the minimum (2, m)-CDS problem on a general graph, where δ is the maximum degree of the graph. Based on it, the algorithm in this paper has performance ratio ln(δ + m − 2) + o(ln δ).…”
Section: Definition 11 ((K M)-cds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 2 [25]: The algorithm for the minimum (2, m)-CDS has a performance ratio α + 2(1 + ln α) for m > 3, where α is the approximation ratio for the minimum (1, m)-CDS and 12.46 for m = 3.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 6: Algorithm 1 is a 5r-approximation for computing (3, m)-CDS, for m > 3, where r is the approximation ratio for computing the minimum (2, m)-CDS in [25].…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%