2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gravitational deflection compensation strategy for HPKMs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, it is suitable for the large-scale production only. Another compensation methodology has been proposed by Eastwood and Webb [3] that was used for gravitational deflection compensation for hybrid parallel kinematic machines. This paper focuses on the modification of control program that is considered to be more realistic in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it is suitable for the large-scale production only. Another compensation methodology has been proposed by Eastwood and Webb [3] that was used for gravitational deflection compensation for hybrid parallel kinematic machines. This paper focuses on the modification of control program that is considered to be more realistic in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eastwood and Webb [26] proposed polar compensation methodology for gravitational deflection compensation for hybrid parallel kinematic machines. In some other works [26,27] the problems of geometrical and compliance errors compensation have been considered simultaneously but these techniques cannot be applied to robot-based machining directly. Hence, to be applied to the robotic-based machining, the existing compliance errors compensation techniques should be essentially revised to take into account essential forces and torques as well as some other important error sources (inaccuracy in serial chains, for instance).…”
Section: Problem Of Compliance Error Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue becomes extremely important in the aerospace industry, where the accuracy requirements are very high but the materials are hard to process. In this case, the manipulator stiffness modelling and corresponding error compensation technique are the key points [2][3][4][5], where in addition to accurate geometric model a sophisticated elastostatic one is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%