2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
820
0
48

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,304 publications
(873 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
820
0
48
Order By: Relevance
“…The reader can find more details about centrality measures in the excellent review of Borgatti and Everett (2006) as well as in the Chapter 5 of the book by Wasserman and Faust (1994).…”
Section: On Walk-based Network Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reader can find more details about centrality measures in the excellent review of Borgatti and Everett (2006) as well as in the Chapter 5 of the book by Wasserman and Faust (1994).…”
Section: On Walk-based Network Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that several other successful centrality measures are not based on walks, such as the closeness, betweenness, and information centrality (Borgatti and Everett, 2006). …”
Section: On Walk-based Network Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C is the highest degree of centrality of all cities in the agglomeration and C is the degree centrality of city i [40].…”
Section: Degree Centrality and Centralization Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different approaches to measure centrality used in the social network area, mostly inherited from graph centrality (Nieminen, 1974;Freeman, 1979;Freeman et al, 1991;Borgatti and Everett, 2006;Latora and Marchiori, 2007). Freeman (1979) describes in a general review three types of centrality as developed in social network research: degree, betweenness and closeness centrality.…”
Section: Individual User Models Cognitive Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%