2022
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A graph neural network approach for molecule carcinogenicity prediction

Abstract: Motivation Molecular carcinogenicity is a preventable cause of cancer, but systematically identifying carcinogenic compounds, which involves performing experiments on animal models, is expensive, time consuming and low throughput. As a result, carcinogenicity information is limited and building data-driven models with good prediction accuracy remains a major challenge. Results In this work, we propose CONCERTO, a deep learnin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, numerous studies have examined the intrinsic information and usefulness of different descriptors and fingerprints. Several researchers in the field have reached the consensus that any type, especially when employed in combination, can effectively accomplish the task, such as FP-GNN and CheMixNet. The molecular descriptors/fingerprints and molecular graphs were combined as input features for the construction of a model architecture. Specifically, for the traditional models (SVM, XGB, and LGB), we concatenated the D-MPNN graph features with alvaDesc descriptors as input features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, numerous studies have examined the intrinsic information and usefulness of different descriptors and fingerprints. Several researchers in the field have reached the consensus that any type, especially when employed in combination, can effectively accomplish the task, such as FP-GNN and CheMixNet. The molecular descriptors/fingerprints and molecular graphs were combined as input features for the construction of a model architecture. Specifically, for the traditional models (SVM, XGB, and LGB), we concatenated the D-MPNN graph features with alvaDesc descriptors as input features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many AI-based models and tools have been developed to predict the carcinogenic potential of compounds. ,,, Limbu and Dakshanamurthy built carcinogenicity prediction models using a hybrid NN architecture with three data sets containing more than 10,000 chemicals, and 653 molecular descriptors . The hybrid NN achieved an average ACC of 74.3% and mean ROC-AUC of 80.6%, which were superior to those of the AdaBoost model but not those of the Bagging and RF models using the same data.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Ai-based Drug Toxicity Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutagenicity refers to a substance’s ability to cause genetic mutations, potentially leading to various disorders, including cancer, while carcinogenicity is a compound’s potential to cause cancer [ 212 , 213 , 214 ]. Given the correlation between these two and the global burden of cancer, it is vital to evaluate mutagenicity and carcinogenicity [ 215 , 216 , 217 ]. Challenges in this task include mutagenicity, inconsistencies in Ames test results, false positives and negatives, and reproducibility issues among labs [ 218 , 219 ].…”
Section: Ai In Medicinal Chemistry or Cheminformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%