2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2947736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Graph-Based Method for Active Outlier Detection With Limited Expert Feedback

Abstract: Labeled data, particularly for the outlier class, are difficult to obtain. Thus, outlier detection is typically regarded as an unsupervised learning problem. However, it still has an opportunity to obtain few labeled data. For example, a human analyst can give feedback to few data when he/she examines the results of an unsupervised outlier detection method. Moreover, the widely used unsupervised method for outlier detection cannot only take the labeled data into consideration nor use them properly. In this stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al [23] introduced a graph-based strategy, enabling an unsupervised approach to evaluate a minimal amount of labeled data. The semi-supervised system was extended to active outlier detection by incorporating a query method that selected top-ranked outliers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [23] introduced a graph-based strategy, enabling an unsupervised approach to evaluate a minimal amount of labeled data. The semi-supervised system was extended to active outlier detection by incorporating a query method that selected top-ranked outliers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, a novel single-objective generative adversarial active learning method was proposed to enrich the information on outliers [24]. And to detect outliers in a few labeled data, a graph-based semisupervised method was designed [25]. However, deep learning models often require a large amount of training data, so they cannot be applied to a small sample of data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%