2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10032-014-0220-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A graph-based approach for segmenting touching lines in historical handwritten documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation results on the ICDAR 2013 dataset and comparison to existing methods [3,10,17,20,25,28] are summarized in Table 3. As shown, the proposed method compares favorably with existing methods.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluation results on the ICDAR 2013 dataset and comparison to existing methods [3,10,17,20,25,28] are summarized in Table 3. As shown, the proposed method compares favorably with existing methods.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the result map had negative values in the textlines and positive values in the background, minimal energy paths that pass between the textlines were extracted by using the dynamic programming. Fernández-Mota et al [3] also proposed a path-finding method based on the similar framework. Yin et al [31] exploited the hierarchical structure in document images and presented a bottom-up grouping method: CCs of an input image were grouped into textlines by using a learned metric.…”
Section: Methods On Textline Detection In Handwritten Documentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two text lines shown in (a.1) and (b.1) include many singleand multiple-touching pairs, but the system can segment and recognize them. In the first text line, the components 10 and 11 are a single-touching pair, abbreviated as p (10,11), but they can be separated by the coarse segmentation. The multiple-touching pairs p (4,5), p (19,20) and p (20,21) are segmented by the fine segmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiple-touching pairs p (4,5), p (19,20) and p (20,21) are segmented by the fine segmentation. In the second text line, the coarse segmentation with stroke width estimation is effective for single-touching pairs p (11,12), p (12,13) and p (13,14) while the fine segmentation works for a singletouching pair p (7,8) and a multiple-touching pair p (14,15). On the other hand, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation