2017
DOI: 10.1177/1056789516676306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gradient-enhanced damage model coupled to plasticity—multi-surface formulation and algorithmic concepts

Abstract: A non-local gradient-enhanced damage-plasticity formulation is proposed, which prevents the loss of well-posedness of the governing field equations in the post-critical damage regime. The non-locality of the formulation then manifests itself in terms of a non-local free energy contribution that penalizes the occurrence of damage gradients. A second penalty term is introduced to force the global damage field to coincide with the internal damage state variable at the Gauss point level. An enforcement of Karush–K… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical solution is then mesh dependent and the actual results are not reliable. Often, size effects and localization mechanisms can be captured with non-local models (Dimitrijevic and Hackl, 2008;Waffenschmidt et al, 2014;He et al, 2015;Kiefer et al, 2017), which use gradients of the variables and introduce a characteristic length. In the current work the proposed damage model is formulated and implemented in the framework of CDM with the assumption of diffuse damage prior to damage localization.…”
Section: Remarks and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical solution is then mesh dependent and the actual results are not reliable. Often, size effects and localization mechanisms can be captured with non-local models (Dimitrijevic and Hackl, 2008;Waffenschmidt et al, 2014;He et al, 2015;Kiefer et al, 2017), which use gradients of the variables and introduce a characteristic length. In the current work the proposed damage model is formulated and implemented in the framework of CDM with the assumption of diffuse damage prior to damage localization.…”
Section: Remarks and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the response for a higher hardening modulus drops earlier and more rapidly -explained by the dependence on only the elastic strains of the damage driving force q. A more detailed analysis of the influence of material parameters for a very similar model can be found in [4]. The regularisation behaviour is analysed in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The main advantage of this approach is to keep the KKT conditions at material point level, allowing the incorporation of many established isotropic damage models. The governing equations for this model follow from a variational approach with homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions for the nonlocal damage field, see [3][4][5]].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach chosen here follows the small strain formulation [1,2] and, in particular, the finite deformation gradient-enhanced framework established in [3,4]. Modelling details of a related small strain model are discussed in [5]. In the framework an additional scalar field variable φ, representing non-local damage, is introduced and linked to the local damage variable d in penalty form.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%